Unpacking temporal trends in U.S. road injury mortality by mode of transportation and sex: An age–period–cohort analysis

Road traffic injuries remain a major health burden in the United States, with vulnerable road users—pedestrians, bicyclists, and motorcyclists—disproportionately affected. Although age is a well-established determinant of road traffic injury risk, most research treats age effects as static, overlooking generational (cohort) differences and historical (period) shifts that shape risk across time. This study applied an Age–Period–Cohort (APC) model to U.S. road mortality data from 1980 to 2021, using Global Burden of Disease estimates disaggregated by age, sex, and mode of transportation. By isolating the contributions of age, cohort, and period effects, findings reveal that conventional cross-sectional methods can misrepresent age-related risk by conflating it with temporal influences, leading to over- or underestimations. For motor vehicle and pedestrian injuries, where risks declined both across historical periods and among more recent cohorts, cross-sectional analyses tend to overestimate risk among older adults and underestimate it among the young. For motorcyclists, age-related risk is often overstated due to unfavorable period effects, while for bicyclists, it is understated due to safety improvements among newer cohorts. Stratifying by sex further reveals disparities in two-wheeled travel: young male motorcyclists face the highest risks, while young female bicyclists experience disproportionate risks often obscured in aggregate data. These results highlight the value of APC modeling in uncovering hidden patterns and providing a more nuanced, temporally sensitive understanding of road risks across demographic and modal lines. Such insights can guide targeted interventions, such as youth-focused motorcycle safety programs, policy measures to protect adolescent female bicyclists, and APC-aware surveillance tools that better anticipate emerging risks. • Applied Age–Period–Cohort models to four decades of U.S. road mortality. • Disentangled age, period, and cohort effects across sex and transportation modes. • Conventional methods overestimate risks for older vehicle users/pedestrians, understate youth • Conventional methods overstate motorcyclist risk via period effects, understate bicyclist risk via cohort effects. • Sex-based disparities exist in two-wheeled travel, with young male motorcyclists and young female bicyclists most at risk.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Cities
Published
2025-10-02
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2025.106492
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Traffic and Road Safety
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.30
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Unpacking temporal trends in U.S. road injury mortality by mode of transportation and sex: An age–period–cohort analysis

Cheng-Kai Hsu
1 citations
Cities
Traffic and Road Safety
1.30
article

Unpacking temporal trends in U.S. road injury mortality by mode of transportation and sex: An age–period–cohort analysis

Cheng-Kai Hsu
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Road traffic injuries remain a major health burden in the United States, with vulnerable road users—pedestrians, bicyclists, and motorcyclists—disproportionately affected. Although age is a well-established determinant of road traffic injury risk, most research treats age effects as static, overlooking generational (cohort) differences and historical (period) shifts that shape risk across time. This study applied an Age–Period–Cohort (APC) model to U.S. road mortality data from 1980 to 2021, using Global Burden of Disease estimates disaggregated by age, sex, and mode of transportation. By isolating the contributions of age, cohort, and period effects, findings reveal that conventional cross-sectional methods can misrepresent age-related risk by conflating it with temporal influences, leading to over- or underestimations. For motor vehicle and pedestrian injuries, where risks declined both across historical periods and among more recent cohorts, cross-sectional analyses tend to overestimate risk among older adults and underestimate it among the young. For motorcyclists, age-related risk is often overstated due to unfavorable period effects, while for bicyclists, it is understated due to safety improvements among newer cohorts. Stratifying by sex further reveals disparities in two-wheeled travel: young male motorcyclists face the highest risks, while young female bicyclists experience disproportionate risks often obscured in aggregate data. These results highlight the value of APC modeling in uncovering hidden patterns and providing a more nuanced, temporally sensitive understanding of road risks across demographic and modal lines. Such insights can guide targeted interventions, such as youth-focused motorcycle safety programs, policy measures to protect adolescent female bicyclists, and APC-aware surveillance tools that better anticipate emerging risks. • Applied Age–Period–Cohort models to four decades of U.S. road mortality. • Disentangled age, period, and cohort effects across sex and transportation modes. • Conventional methods overestimate risks for older vehicle users/pedestrians, understate youth • Conventional methods overstate motorcyclist risk via period effects, understate bicyclist risk via cohort effects. • Sex-based disparities exist in two-wheeled travel, with young male motorcyclists and young female bicyclists most at risk.

CitiesVol. 169
University of California, Berkeley (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 16%
Traffic and Road Safety
1.30
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.