Risk Indicators for Peri-Implant Diseases and Peri- Implantitis Severity: A Cross-Sectional Study on Implants with 5 to 10 Years of Loading

Background: Peri-implant-implant diseases, such as peri-implant mucositis and peri-implantitis, present significant challenges in implant dentistry. A peri-implant mucositis prevalence of 43% and peri-implantitis prevalence of 22% have been reported. While treatment for peri-implant mucositis is generally predictable, peri-implantitis exhibits high recurrence rates and less predictable outcomes, particularly in severe bone loss cases. Identifying critical risk factors is essential for early diagnosis, prevention, and management. Aim: This study aimed to identify the most critical risk indicators for peri-implantitis and peri- implant mucositis within a unified model and assess how these factors are associated with the severity of peri-implantitis. Methods: A cross-sectional study was conducted at the University of Michigan School of Dentistry, involving 202 patients with 405 implants. Data on patient characteristics, systemic conditions, homecare, history of periodontitis, and implant-related variables were collected. Clinical and radiographic examinations determined peri-implant health status. Mixed-effects logistic regression models identified significant risk indicators, while ordinal logistic regression explored associations with disease severity. Results: For peri-implant mucositis, key factors included lack of access for interproximal brushes (OR = 1.44, 95% CI: 1.30-1.98), poor oral hygiene (OR = 3.11, 95% CI: 2.47-3.41), low compliance with professional dental cleanings (OR = 3.12 95% CI: 2.88-3.41), and history of Periodontitis (OR = 2.101, 95% CI: 1.881 - 2.988). Similarly, in peri-implantitis, significant factors were lack of access for interproximal brushes (OR = 2.88, 95% CI: 2.14 – 3.11), poor oral hygiene (OR = 1.98, 95% CI: 1.61- 3.12), low compliance with professional dental cleanings (OR = 2.41 95% CI: 1.93 – 2.88), and history of Periodontitis (OR = 1.87 95% CI: 1.12 – 2.56). 12 For bone-level implants, short abutment height (OR = 2.16, 95% CI: 1.15 – 4.03), high abutment angles >30° (OR = 2.243, 95% CI: 1.249 - 4.028), and shallow implant placement (OR = 4.48, 95% CI: 2.37 – 8.46) were found with significant associations to peri-implantitis. For peri- implantitis severity, factors such as thin peri-implant mucosa (OR = 3.33 95% CI: 2.11 – 3.981), implants in smokers, (OR = 4.14, 95% CI: 2.04 – 7.14), posterior implant position (OR = 10.140, 95% CI: 3.340 - 15.870), and shallow implant placement (OR = 2.81, 95% CI: 2.19 – 4.19) were significantly associated with severe peri-implant bone loss >50%. Conclusion: This study identified the most critical risk indicators for peri-implant mucositis and peri-implantitis, including inadequate oral hygiene, history of periodontitis. In bone level implants implant implant restoration factors, such as short abutments <2 mm, high abutment emergence agles >30°, and shallow implant placement were identified as risk indicators for peri- implantitis. For peri-implantitis severity, the key factors were thin peri-implant mucosa, smoking, posterior implantplacement, and shallow implant placement.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Deep Blue (University of Michigan)
Published
2025-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.7302/26335
Primary Topic
Dental Implant Techniques and Outcomes
Type
article
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Risk Indicators for Peri-Implant Diseases and Peri- Implantitis Severity: A Cross-Sectional Study on Implants with 5 to 10 Years of Loading

Jacob Martin Zimmer
Deep Blue (University of Michigan)
Dental Implant Techniques and Outcomes
article

Risk Indicators for Peri-Implant Diseases and Peri- Implantitis Severity: A Cross-Sectional Study on Implants with 5 to 10 Years of Loading

Jacob Martin Zimmer
article en

Abstract

Background: Peri-implant-implant diseases, such as peri-implant mucositis and peri-implantitis, present significant challenges in implant dentistry. A peri-implant mucositis prevalence of 43% and peri-implantitis prevalence of 22% have been reported. While treatment for peri-implant mucositis is generally predictable, peri-implantitis exhibits high recurrence rates and less predictable outcomes, particularly in severe bone loss cases. Identifying critical risk factors is essential for early diagnosis, prevention, and management. Aim: This study aimed to identify the most critical risk indicators for peri-implantitis and peri- implant mucositis within a unified model and assess how these factors are associated with the severity of peri-implantitis. Methods: A cross-sectional study was conducted at the University of Michigan School of Dentistry, involving 202 patients with 405 implants. Data on patient characteristics, systemic conditions, homecare, history of periodontitis, and implant-related variables were collected. Clinical and radiographic examinations determined peri-implant health status. Mixed-effects logistic regression models identified significant risk indicators, while ordinal logistic regression explored associations with disease severity. Results: For peri-implant mucositis, key factors included lack of access for interproximal brushes (OR = 1.44, 95% CI: 1.30-1.98), poor oral hygiene (OR = 3.11, 95% CI: 2.47-3.41), low compliance with professional dental cleanings (OR = 3.12 95% CI: 2.88-3.41), and history of Periodontitis (OR = 2.101, 95% CI: 1.881 - 2.988). Similarly, in peri-implantitis, significant factors were lack of access for interproximal brushes (OR = 2.88, 95% CI: 2.14 – 3.11), poor oral hygiene (OR = 1.98, 95% CI: 1.61- 3.12), low compliance with professional dental cleanings (OR = 2.41 95% CI: 1.93 – 2.88), and history of Periodontitis (OR = 1.87 95% CI: 1.12 – 2.56). 12 For bone-level implants, short abutment height (OR = 2.16, 95% CI: 1.15 – 4.03), high abutment angles >30° (OR = 2.243, 95% CI: 1.249 - 4.028), and shallow implant placement (OR = 4.48, 95% CI: 2.37 – 8.46) were found with significant associations to peri-implantitis. For peri- implantitis severity, factors such as thin peri-implant mucosa (OR = 3.33 95% CI: 2.11 – 3.981), implants in smokers, (OR = 4.14, 95% CI: 2.04 – 7.14), posterior implant position (OR = 10.140, 95% CI: 3.340 - 15.870), and shallow implant placement (OR = 2.81, 95% CI: 2.19 – 4.19) were significantly associated with severe peri-implant bone loss >50%. Conclusion: This study identified the most critical risk indicators for peri-implant mucositis and peri-implantitis, including inadequate oral hygiene, history of periodontitis. In bone level implants implant implant restoration factors, such as short abutments <2 mm, high abutment emergence agles >30°, and shallow implant placement were identified as risk indicators for peri- implantitis. For peri-implantitis severity, the key factors were thin peri-implant mucosa, smoking, posterior implantplacement, and shallow implant placement.

Deep Blue (University of Michigan)
Dental Implant Techniques and Outcomes
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.