Measuring Social Trust in AI: How Institutions Shape the Usage Intention of AI‐Based Technologies

What drives people to have trust in using artificial intelligence (AI)? How does the institutional environment shape social trust in AI? This study addresses these questions to explain the role of institutions in allowing AI‐based technologies to be socially accepted. In this study, social trust in AI is situated in three institutional entities, namely, the government, tech companies, and the scientific community. It is posited that the level of social trust in AI is correlated to the level of trust in these institutions. The stronger the trust in the institutions, the deeper the social trust in the use of AI. To test this hypothesis, we conducted a cross‐country survey involving a total of 4037 respondents in Singapore, Taiwan, Japan, and the Republic of Korea (ROK). The results show convincing evidence of how institutions shape social trust in AI and its acceptance. Our empirical findings reveal that trust in institutions is positively associated with trust in AI technologies. Trust in institutions is based on perceived competence, benevolence, and integrity. It can directly affect people’s trust in AI technologies. Also, our empirical findings confirm that trust in AI technologies is positively associated with the intention to use these technologies. This means that a higher level of trust in AI technologies leads to a higher level of intention to use these technologies. In conclusion, institutions greatly matter in the construction and production of social trust in AI‐based technologies. Trust in AI is not a direct affair between the user and the product, but it is mediated by the whole institutional setting. This has profound implications on the governance of AI in society. By taking into account institutional factors in the planning and implementation of AI regulations, we can be assured that social trust in AI is sufficiently founded.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Human Behavior and Emerging Technologies
Published
2025-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1155/hbe2/4084384
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
4.73
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Measuring Social Trust in AI: How Institutions Shape the Usage Intention of AI‐Based Technologies

Iuna Tsyrulneva, Sulfikar Amir, Sabrina Ching Yuen Luk, Shrestha Saha et al.
2 citations
Human Behavior and Emerging Technologies
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
4.73
article

Measuring Social Trust in AI: How Institutions Shape the Usage Intention of AI‐Based Technologies

Iuna Tsyrulneva, Sulfikar Amir, Sabrina Ching Yuen Luk, Shrestha Saha, Marcus T. L. Teo
article en
2 citations

Abstract

What drives people to have trust in using artificial intelligence (AI)? How does the institutional environment shape social trust in AI? This study addresses these questions to explain the role of institutions in allowing AI‐based technologies to be socially accepted. In this study, social trust in AI is situated in three institutional entities, namely, the government, tech companies, and the scientific community. It is posited that the level of social trust in AI is correlated to the level of trust in these institutions. The stronger the trust in the institutions, the deeper the social trust in the use of AI. To test this hypothesis, we conducted a cross‐country survey involving a total of 4037 respondents in Singapore, Taiwan, Japan, and the Republic of Korea (ROK). The results show convincing evidence of how institutions shape social trust in AI and its acceptance. Our empirical findings reveal that trust in institutions is positively associated with trust in AI technologies. Trust in institutions is based on perceived competence, benevolence, and integrity. It can directly affect people’s trust in AI technologies. Also, our empirical findings confirm that trust in AI technologies is positively associated with the intention to use these technologies. This means that a higher level of trust in AI technologies leads to a higher level of intention to use these technologies. In conclusion, institutions greatly matter in the construction and production of social trust in AI‐based technologies. Trust in AI is not a direct affair between the user and the product, but it is mediated by the whole institutional setting. This has profound implications on the governance of AI in society. By taking into account institutional factors in the planning and implementation of AI regulations, we can be assured that social trust in AI is sufficiently founded.

Human Behavior and Emerging TechnologiesVol. 2025(1)
National University of Singapore (SG), Nanyang Technological University (SG), Earth Observatory of Singapore (SG)
Openalex Percentile: Top 5%
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
4.73
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.