Welfare of the rubber crop diversity farmers under risks of price in Thailand

The presence of risks in rubber markets would have significant adverse effects on farmers’ welfare. Crop diversity is usually proposed as a countermeasure to mitigate the negative environmental impacts and high price risks faced by monocultural rubber farmers. Given that most farmers in developing countries are risk-averse, the present study aims to examine the differences in price risk experienced by crop diversity and monoculture rubber farmers, while illustrating the welfare impacts of crop diversity within a theoretic risk-averse framework. Standard deviation is employed as a measure of price risk indices for rubber and other major agricultural products. The data on prices of main agricultural products were obtained from the Office of Agricultural Economics (OAE), covering the period from 2002 to 2021. The estimated price risk indices for rubber prices and prices of 18 other major crops indicate that the annual rubber price risk index is highest among all major agricultural products in Thailand, with a value of .417. In comparison, the average price risk indices of food crops and horticulture/fruit crops are .252 and .257, respectively. These elevated levels of rubber price risks could result in substantial risk costs and decreased welfare for farmers engaged in monoculture practices, particularly those who are trapped in poverty. This confirms the potential benefit associated with adopting crop diversity to enhance household welfare within the rubber industry, providing compelling evidence supporting efforts towards promoting rubber crop diversity plantation and sustainable development of rubber industry in Thailand.

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Kasetsart Journal of Social Sciences
Published
2025-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.34044/j.kjss.2025.46.3.18
Primary Topic
Agricultural Economics and Practices
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Welfare of the rubber crop diversity farmers under risks of price in Thailand

Kasetsart Journal of Social Sciences
Agricultural Economics and Practices
article

Welfare of the rubber crop diversity farmers under risks of price in Thailand

article en

Abstract

The presence of risks in rubber markets would have significant adverse effects on farmers’ welfare. Crop diversity is usually proposed as a countermeasure to mitigate the negative environmental impacts and high price risks faced by monocultural rubber farmers. Given that most farmers in developing countries are risk-averse, the present study aims to examine the differences in price risk experienced by crop diversity and monoculture rubber farmers, while illustrating the welfare impacts of crop diversity within a theoretic risk-averse framework. Standard deviation is employed as a measure of price risk indices for rubber and other major agricultural products. The data on prices of main agricultural products were obtained from the Office of Agricultural Economics (OAE), covering the period from 2002 to 2021. The estimated price risk indices for rubber prices and prices of 18 other major crops indicate that the annual rubber price risk index is highest among all major agricultural products in Thailand, with a value of .417. In comparison, the average price risk indices of food crops and horticulture/fruit crops are .252 and .257, respectively. These elevated levels of rubber price risks could result in substantial risk costs and decreased welfare for farmers engaged in monoculture practices, particularly those who are trapped in poverty. This confirms the potential benefit associated with adopting crop diversity to enhance household welfare within the rubber industry, providing compelling evidence supporting efforts towards promoting rubber crop diversity plantation and sustainable development of rubber industry in Thailand.

Kasetsart Journal of Social SciencesVol. 46(3)
Nanjing Agricultural University (CN), Guangdong University Of Finances and Economics (CN), Guangzhou Vocational College of Science and Technology (CN)
National Natural Science Foundation of China, China Scholarship Council, Nanjing Agricultural University, Priority Academic Program Development of Jiangsu Higher Education Institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 59%
Agricultural Economics and Practices
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.