Comparative Analysis of P40 and 34betaE12. Immunohistochemistry in the Diagnosis of Prostate Lesions: Insights into Diagnostic Utility

Introduction: Prostate carcinoma remains one of the commonly diagnosed cancers and a leading cause of morbidity and mortality worldwide. The diagnostic challenge in distinguishing benign and malignant prostate lesions remains significant, especially in small biopsies. Immunohistochemistry(IHC) serves as a valuable adjunct tool in the diagnosis and management of prostate malignancies. This study aims to evaluate the utility of P40 expression in the diagnosis of prostate lesions and to compare with the immunohistochemical expression of 34betaE12 in benign, premalignant and malignant lesions of the prostate. Materials & methods: This investigation was done at the Sree Balaji Medical College and Hospital, Department of Pathology,Chennai,India. Total 41 males with prostate specimens Prostatic specimens(biopsies and resections) satisfying inclusion and exclusion criteria were included in this cross-sectional research study.Initial sections weres tained with Hematoxylin and eosin stain followed by IHC staining with two markers, P40 and 34BetaE12.Data were analysed using the mean and standard deviation for quantitative variables, as well as frequency and percentage for categorical variables, for descriptive purposes. Statistical analysis was made with IBM SPSS 16.0 software and P value of <0.05 was considered significant. RESULTS: Of the 41 cases examined, the most prevalent pathology was a benign lesion(51.2%), followed by 41.5% malignant and 7.3% had premalignant lesions. All patients with benign lesions and pre-malignant lesions were positive and all malignant lesions were negative for P40 staining. There was statistically significant increase in P40 and 35betaE12 staining among patients with benign and pre- malignant lesions. Conclusion: Our findings suggest that immunohistochemical markers 34betaE12 and p40 have been found to be of value in differentiating benign and malignant lesions of the prostate thereby playing an important role in management of patient and therapeutic outcome.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Acta Bioclínica
Published
2025-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.53766/acbio/2025.15.30.e.09
Primary Topic
Prostate Cancer Treatment and Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Comparative Analysis of P40 and 34betaE12. Immunohistochemistry in the Diagnosis of Prostate Lesions: Insights into Diagnostic Utility

M. Naga Meena Lochini, Sai Sudha, Vindu Srivastava
Acta Bioclínica
Prostate Cancer Treatment and Research
article

Comparative Analysis of P40 and 34betaE12. Immunohistochemistry in the Diagnosis of Prostate Lesions: Insights into Diagnostic Utility

M. Naga Meena Lochini, Sai Sudha, Vindu Srivastava
article en

Abstract

Introduction: Prostate carcinoma remains one of the commonly diagnosed cancers and a leading cause of morbidity and mortality worldwide. The diagnostic challenge in distinguishing benign and malignant prostate lesions remains significant, especially in small biopsies. Immunohistochemistry(IHC) serves as a valuable adjunct tool in the diagnosis and management of prostate malignancies. This study aims to evaluate the utility of P40 expression in the diagnosis of prostate lesions and to compare with the immunohistochemical expression of 34betaE12 in benign, premalignant and malignant lesions of the prostate. Materials & methods: This investigation was done at the Sree Balaji Medical College and Hospital, Department of Pathology,Chennai,India. Total 41 males with prostate specimens Prostatic specimens(biopsies and resections) satisfying inclusion and exclusion criteria were included in this cross-sectional research study.Initial sections weres tained with Hematoxylin and eosin stain followed by IHC staining with two markers, P40 and 34BetaE12.Data were analysed using the mean and standard deviation for quantitative variables, as well as frequency and percentage for categorical variables, for descriptive purposes. Statistical analysis was made with IBM SPSS 16.0 software and P value of <0.05 was considered significant. RESULTS: Of the 41 cases examined, the most prevalent pathology was a benign lesion(51.2%), followed by 41.5% malignant and 7.3% had premalignant lesions. All patients with benign lesions and pre-malignant lesions were positive and all malignant lesions were negative for P40 staining. There was statistically significant increase in P40 and 35betaE12 staining among patients with benign and pre- malignant lesions. Conclusion: Our findings suggest that immunohistochemical markers 34betaE12 and p40 have been found to be of value in differentiating benign and malignant lesions of the prostate thereby playing an important role in management of patient and therapeutic outcome.

Acta BioclínicaVol. 15(30)
Openalex Percentile: Top 60%
Prostate Cancer Treatment and Research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.