Using Generative AI to Grapple with the Not-Yet-Known

This empirical paper presents the Critical Participatory Co-Design (CPC) Method, with preliminary research findings based on the case study of a workshop. It explores the potential of human-AI co-creation to facilitate the participation of communities in envisioning responsible technology design and deployment. On the methodological side, the paper describes this method that combines the steps of Critical Making, Participatory Design's paper prototyping for scenario building, the creation of shared languages, and generative AI through a device called Street2Paradise_ for speculative future visions. On the empirical side, an experimental case study conducted with urban designers is presented to investigate the method's validity, its capability to contribute to critical thinking and reflexivity, and how it can include communities in large-scale technology development. The paper proposes rigorous approaches to understanding the value of the CPC method. It also opens up a broader problem space for the future: whether such methods can empower communities to change the course of large-scale digital transformations. The paper contributes to the growing body of HCI and CSCW literature on technology-assisted participatory and reflexive methods for equitable sociotechnical futures.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Published
2025-07-20
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1145/3742800.3742844
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Innovative Human-Technology Interaction
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.94
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Using Generative AI to Grapple with the Not-Yet-Known

Regina Sipos
1 citations
Innovative Human-Technology Interaction
1.94
article

Using Generative AI to Grapple with the Not-Yet-Known

Regina Sipos
article en
1 citations

Abstract

This empirical paper presents the Critical Participatory Co-Design (CPC) Method, with preliminary research findings based on the case study of a workshop. It explores the potential of human-AI co-creation to facilitate the participation of communities in envisioning responsible technology design and deployment. On the methodological side, the paper describes this method that combines the steps of Critical Making, Participatory Design's paper prototyping for scenario building, the creation of shared languages, and generative AI through a device called Street2Paradise_ for speculative future visions. On the empirical side, an experimental case study conducted with urban designers is presented to investigate the method's validity, its capability to contribute to critical thinking and reflexivity, and how it can include communities in large-scale technology development. The paper proposes rigorous approaches to understanding the value of the CPC method. It also opens up a broader problem space for the future: whether such methods can empower communities to change the course of large-scale digital transformations. The paper contributes to the growing body of HCI and CSCW literature on technology-assisted participatory and reflexive methods for equitable sociotechnical futures.

Technical University of Munich (DE)
Openalex Percentile: Top 12%
Innovative Human-Technology Interaction
1.94
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.