A novel approach to method selection in multi-criteria decision-making

MCDM (Multi-Criteria Decision-Making) involves the systematic process of ranking alternative options based on multiple criteria, a task frequently encountered across diverse fields. Within MCDM operations, the choice of both the ranking method for alternatives (MCDM method) and the weighting method for criteria significantly impacts the final ranking outcomes. This study introduces an entirely novel approach for identifying the most suitable pair combining an alternative ranking method with a criterion weighting method. The investigating three prominent alternative ranking methods: TOPSIS (Technique for Order Preference by Similarity to Ideal Solution), MOORA (Multiobjective Optimization On the basis of Ratio Analysis), and RAM (Root Assessment Method). For criterion weighting, three methods were considered: RS (Rank Sum), RR (Rank Reciprocal), and ROC (Rank Order Centroid). To facilitate comprehensive comparison, a Taguchi experimental matrix was designed, yielding nine distinct experimental combinations, each pairing one ranking method with one weighting method. This resulted in the comparison of nine specific combinations: TOPSIS-RS, TOPSIS-RR, TOPSIS-ROC, MOORA-RS, MOORA-RR, MOORA-ROC, RAM-RS, RAM-RR, and RAM-ROC. The DEAR (Data Envelopment Analysis-based Ranking) method was employed to compare these combined pairs across four distinct examples. Two primary criteria were used to determine the most suitable combination: the average Spearman's rank correlation coefficient between each pair and the ratio of alternative scores for each pair. The use of the DEAR method to compare the combinations between each MCDM method and each weighting method is first introduced in this study. This simple approach allows for the comparison of multiple combinations with minimal computation, helping to determine the best combination of an MCDM and a weighting method for the criteria. The findings indicate that the RAM-RS and MOORA-RS combinations demonstrated superior performance compared to the others, while TOPSIS-RR and TOPSIS-ROC proved to be the least effective. Therefore, RAM-RS and MOORA-RS are two recommended combinations for use in MCDM problems

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
EUREKA Physics and Engineering
Published
2025-09-29
DOI
https://doi.org/10.21303/2461-4262.2025.003913
Primary Topic
Multi-Criteria Decision Making
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A novel approach to method selection in multi-criteria decision-making

Hoang Xuan Thinh, Nguyễn Trọng, Tran Van Dua, Trần Trung
EUREKA Physics and Engineering
Multi-Criteria Decision Making
article

A novel approach to method selection in multi-criteria decision-making

Hoang Xuan Thinh, Nguyễn Trọng, Tran Van Dua, Trần Trung
article en

Abstract

MCDM (Multi-Criteria Decision-Making) involves the systematic process of ranking alternative options based on multiple criteria, a task frequently encountered across diverse fields. Within MCDM operations, the choice of both the ranking method for alternatives (MCDM method) and the weighting method for criteria significantly impacts the final ranking outcomes. This study introduces an entirely novel approach for identifying the most suitable pair combining an alternative ranking method with a criterion weighting method. The investigating three prominent alternative ranking methods: TOPSIS (Technique for Order Preference by Similarity to Ideal Solution), MOORA (Multiobjective Optimization On the basis of Ratio Analysis), and RAM (Root Assessment Method). For criterion weighting, three methods were considered: RS (Rank Sum), RR (Rank Reciprocal), and ROC (Rank Order Centroid). To facilitate comprehensive comparison, a Taguchi experimental matrix was designed, yielding nine distinct experimental combinations, each pairing one ranking method with one weighting method. This resulted in the comparison of nine specific combinations: TOPSIS-RS, TOPSIS-RR, TOPSIS-ROC, MOORA-RS, MOORA-RR, MOORA-ROC, RAM-RS, RAM-RR, and RAM-ROC. The DEAR (Data Envelopment Analysis-based Ranking) method was employed to compare these combined pairs across four distinct examples. Two primary criteria were used to determine the most suitable combination: the average Spearman's rank correlation coefficient between each pair and the ratio of alternative scores for each pair. The use of the DEAR method to compare the combinations between each MCDM method and each weighting method is first introduced in this study. This simple approach allows for the comparison of multiple combinations with minimal computation, helping to determine the best combination of an MCDM and a weighting method for the criteria. The findings indicate that the RAM-RS and MOORA-RS combinations demonstrated superior performance compared to the others, while TOPSIS-RR and TOPSIS-ROC proved to be the least effective. Therefore, RAM-RS and MOORA-RS are two recommended combinations for use in MCDM problems

EUREKA Physics and Engineering(5)
National Research Institute (US), State Research Institute of Mechanical Engineering (RU), Hanoi University of Industry (VN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 68%
Multi-Criteria Decision Making
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.