Nonthermal Technologies in Plant‐Based Alternative Processing: Applications, Challenges, and Future Perspectives

The growing demand for plant‐based alternatives has urged the development of advanced processing technologies that enhance product quality while maintaining nutritional integrity. Nonthermal technologies, including high‐pressure processing (HPP), pulsed electric field (PEF), ultrasound, ultraviolet (UV) light, irradiation, and cold plasma (CP), offer effective alternatives to traditional thermal methods. These technologies improve microbial safety, enhance protein functionality, and extend shelf life without compromising sensory and nutritional properties. This review summarizes the applications of nonthermal technologies in plant‐based food processing, focusing on their roles in modifying texture, flavor, protein structure, and nutrient bioavailability. HPP enhances food safety and textural properties, while PEF facilitates protein extraction and enzymatic modifications. Ultrasound aids in emulsification and structural changes, whereas UV light and irradiation contribute to microbial decontamination and shelf life extension. CP shows potential in antimicrobial applications and as an enhancer of functional ingredients. Despite their advantages, challenges such as scalability, processing costs, regulatory concerns, and consumer acceptance hinder widespread adoption. Moreover, the complex interactions between plant‐based matrices and nonthermal treatments require further investigation to optimize processing conditions. Future research should investigate the synergistic effects of combining multiple nonthermal techniques, enhance process efficiency, and establish standardized guidelines for industrial applications. Advances in automation and real‐time monitoring could further enhance these technologies, ensuring the production of high‐quality, sustainable, and nutritionally optimized plant‐based alternatives. With continued innovation, nonthermal processing has the potential to revolutionize the plant‐based food industry.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Food Processing and Preservation
Published
2025-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1155/jfpp/4986605
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Electrohydrodynamics and Fluid Dynamics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.73
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Nonthermal Technologies in Plant‐Based Alternative Processing: Applications, Challenges, and Future Perspectives

Tanvir Ahmed, Md Rahmatuzzaman Rana, Alkatuzzakia Akhi, Md. Nazmul Islam
1 citations
Journal of Food Processing and Preservation
Electrohydrodynamics and Fluid Dynamics
0.73
article

Nonthermal Technologies in Plant‐Based Alternative Processing: Applications, Challenges, and Future Perspectives

Tanvir Ahmed, Md Rahmatuzzaman Rana, Alkatuzzakia Akhi, Md. Nazmul Islam
article en
1 citations

Abstract

The growing demand for plant‐based alternatives has urged the development of advanced processing technologies that enhance product quality while maintaining nutritional integrity. Nonthermal technologies, including high‐pressure processing (HPP), pulsed electric field (PEF), ultrasound, ultraviolet (UV) light, irradiation, and cold plasma (CP), offer effective alternatives to traditional thermal methods. These technologies improve microbial safety, enhance protein functionality, and extend shelf life without compromising sensory and nutritional properties. This review summarizes the applications of nonthermal technologies in plant‐based food processing, focusing on their roles in modifying texture, flavor, protein structure, and nutrient bioavailability. HPP enhances food safety and textural properties, while PEF facilitates protein extraction and enzymatic modifications. Ultrasound aids in emulsification and structural changes, whereas UV light and irradiation contribute to microbial decontamination and shelf life extension. CP shows potential in antimicrobial applications and as an enhancer of functional ingredients. Despite their advantages, challenges such as scalability, processing costs, regulatory concerns, and consumer acceptance hinder widespread adoption. Moreover, the complex interactions between plant‐based matrices and nonthermal treatments require further investigation to optimize processing conditions. Future research should investigate the synergistic effects of combining multiple nonthermal techniques, enhance process efficiency, and establish standardized guidelines for industrial applications. Advances in automation and real‐time monitoring could further enhance these technologies, ensuring the production of high‐quality, sustainable, and nutritionally optimized plant‐based alternatives. With continued innovation, nonthermal processing has the potential to revolutionize the plant‐based food industry.

Journal of Food Processing and PreservationVol. 2025(1)
Shahjalal University of Science and Technology (BD), Noakhali Science and Technology University (BD)
Openalex Percentile: Top 23%
Electrohydrodynamics and Fluid Dynamics
0.73
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.