Exploring students’ perspectives on ‘contingent support’ in a broad interprofessional education programme

The interprofessional education (IPE) and practice field has been in a positive development over the past decades. However, there are still pedagogical challenges to overcome. There is a need for research that can contribute to a better understanding of teaching- and learning processes involved in IPE. This article reports from a study exploring students’ stories of the kind of contingent support they need to support their learning processes in a broad IPE programme focusing on children. The programme involves students across health-, social care-, and teacher educations. The study draws on survey data ( N = 499) and interview data ( N = 15) and makes use of concepts from the scaffolding literature in the investigations. A theoretical starting point used is that each student participating in IPE has an individual zone of proximal development (Vygotsky et al., 1978), but also that a group may have a joint zone. Results of the study suggest that for facilitators of IPE to provide contingent support in such a context, focus should both be placed on individual students, as well as on the group. Moreover, contingent support should be offered both prior to, as well as during, the students’ work in interprofessional learning groups to support their learning processes.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
International Journal of Educational Research
Published
2025-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijer.2025.102813
Primary Topic
Interprofessional Education and Collaboration
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Exploring students’ perspectives on ‘contingent support’ in a broad interprofessional education programme

Finn Aarsæther, Kaja Braathen, Liv Mette Gulbrandsen
International Journal of Educational Research
Interprofessional Education and Collaboration
article

Exploring students’ perspectives on ‘contingent support’ in a broad interprofessional education programme

Finn Aarsæther, Kaja Braathen, Liv Mette Gulbrandsen
article en

Abstract

The interprofessional education (IPE) and practice field has been in a positive development over the past decades. However, there are still pedagogical challenges to overcome. There is a need for research that can contribute to a better understanding of teaching- and learning processes involved in IPE. This article reports from a study exploring students’ stories of the kind of contingent support they need to support their learning processes in a broad IPE programme focusing on children. The programme involves students across health-, social care-, and teacher educations. The study draws on survey data ( N = 499) and interview data ( N = 15) and makes use of concepts from the scaffolding literature in the investigations. A theoretical starting point used is that each student participating in IPE has an individual zone of proximal development (Vygotsky et al., 1978), but also that a group may have a joint zone. Results of the study suggest that for facilitators of IPE to provide contingent support in such a context, focus should both be placed on individual students, as well as on the group. Moreover, contingent support should be offered both prior to, as well as during, the students’ work in interprofessional learning groups to support their learning processes.

International Journal of Educational ResearchVol. 134
OsloMet – Oslo Metropolitan University (NO), University of South-Eastern Norway (NO)
Openalex Percentile: Top 57%
Interprofessional Education and Collaboration
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.