AI and digital literacy in translation competence development

Numerous studies in translation process research (TPR) show that both professional and student translation processes become more efficient, and the outputs become of even higher quality and more consistent using AI as machine pre-processing. The aim of this empirical keylogging study was to explore how school pupils and university students use conventional translation tools, e.g., machine translation (MT), and innovative developments, such as ChatGPT, in comparison. Specifically, we looked at how (often) the participants used the tools, the effects on language processing and translation quality, and which translation strategies were employed. We expected students who, in comparison to the pupils, display greater translation competence, to deliver better final translations and to harness the power of the available tools more effectively to their advantage. The results of this study confirm this assumption and are in line with TPR studies. Students used a greater variety of tools to solve different problems and also prompted more when only allowed to use ChatGPT. This study shows that tools alone, in their current state, do not make up for lacking language skills. On the contrary: Language skills are necessary to evaluate the tool output and make informed decisions. Finally, this study suggests an expansion of the existing translation and post-editing competence models, as future translation students have already come in contact with prevalent innovative language technologies and thus have different prerequisites.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
SKASE Journal of translation and interpretation.
Published
2025-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.33542/jti2025-s-7
Primary Topic
Foreign Language Teaching Methods
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

AI and digital literacy in translation competence development

Silvia Hansen‐Schirra, Dimitrios Kapnas, Athanasios Breskas
SKASE Journal of translation and interpretation.
Foreign Language Teaching Methods
article

AI and digital literacy in translation competence development

Silvia Hansen‐Schirra, Dimitrios Kapnas, Athanasios Breskas
article en

Abstract

Numerous studies in translation process research (TPR) show that both professional and student translation processes become more efficient, and the outputs become of even higher quality and more consistent using AI as machine pre-processing. The aim of this empirical keylogging study was to explore how school pupils and university students use conventional translation tools, e.g., machine translation (MT), and innovative developments, such as ChatGPT, in comparison. Specifically, we looked at how (often) the participants used the tools, the effects on language processing and translation quality, and which translation strategies were employed. We expected students who, in comparison to the pupils, display greater translation competence, to deliver better final translations and to harness the power of the available tools more effectively to their advantage. The results of this study confirm this assumption and are in line with TPR studies. Students used a greater variety of tools to solve different problems and also prompted more when only allowed to use ChatGPT. This study shows that tools alone, in their current state, do not make up for lacking language skills. On the contrary: Language skills are necessary to evaluate the tool output and make informed decisions. Finally, this study suggests an expansion of the existing translation and post-editing competence models, as future translation students have already come in contact with prevalent innovative language technologies and thus have different prerequisites.

SKASE Journal of translation and interpretation.Vol. 18(2)
Gutenberg College (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 71%
Foreign Language Teaching Methods
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.