The Balance and Insufficiency of Cultural Content in Chinese English Textbooks: A Systematic Literature Review

This study is a systematic review. The research searched Google Scholar from 2013 to 2025, etc. The search terms included "English textbooks/Cultural Presentation /Cortazzi & Jin/ICC/ concentric circles /Big C/Small C/Hofstede", etc. The inclusion criteria are: taking Chinese English textbooks or comparable EFL textbooks as the objects, discussing within the culture, and extractable methods and results. After title/abstract screening and full-text review, 18 articles were finally included (9 empirical and 9 theoretical/methodological). The main findings are: The proportion of the three types of cultures - local, target and international - is unbalanced, and international culture is significantly insufficient. A large amount of content remains at the superficial level, lacking the advancement from “Small C” to “big C” and the value level. Disconnected from student life; The inconsistent conclusions on the proportion of local and target cultures in different versions are mostly related to the differences in samples and perspectives. The contribution of this paper lies in: taking Cortazzi & Jin as the main axis, integrating ICC, concentric circles, Hofstede, and Big C/Small c for integrated comparison, and proposing an operational improvement idea of "proportion - advancement - context". Practical significance: It provides key points for quota and hierarchical design for textbook compilers, offers suggestions for localized supplementary and comparative tasks for teachers, and points policy makers towards implementable evaluation indicators and resource allocation

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Uniglobal Journal of Social Sciences and Humanities
Published
2025-09-26
DOI
https://doi.org/10.53797/ujssh.v4i2.26.2025
Primary Topic
EFL/ESL Teaching and Learning
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The Balance and Insufficiency of Cultural Content in Chinese English Textbooks: A Systematic Literature Review

Ruxin Wang
Uniglobal Journal of Social Sciences and Humanities
EFL/ESL Teaching and Learning
article

The Balance and Insufficiency of Cultural Content in Chinese English Textbooks: A Systematic Literature Review

Ruxin Wang
article en

Abstract

This study is a systematic review. The research searched Google Scholar from 2013 to 2025, etc. The search terms included "English textbooks/Cultural Presentation /Cortazzi & Jin/ICC/ concentric circles /Big C/Small C/Hofstede", etc. The inclusion criteria are: taking Chinese English textbooks or comparable EFL textbooks as the objects, discussing within the culture, and extractable methods and results. After title/abstract screening and full-text review, 18 articles were finally included (9 empirical and 9 theoretical/methodological). The main findings are: The proportion of the three types of cultures - local, target and international - is unbalanced, and international culture is significantly insufficient. A large amount of content remains at the superficial level, lacking the advancement from “Small C” to “big C” and the value level. Disconnected from student life; The inconsistent conclusions on the proportion of local and target cultures in different versions are mostly related to the differences in samples and perspectives. The contribution of this paper lies in: taking Cortazzi & Jin as the main axis, integrating ICC, concentric circles, Hofstede, and Big C/Small c for integrated comparison, and proposing an operational improvement idea of "proportion - advancement - context". Practical significance: It provides key points for quota and hierarchical design for textbook compilers, offers suggestions for localized supplementary and comparative tasks for teachers, and points policy makers towards implementable evaluation indicators and resource allocation

Uniglobal Journal of Social Sciences and HumanitiesVol. 4(2)
University of Sheffield (GB)
Openalex Percentile: Top 66%
EFL/ESL Teaching and Learning
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.