Analisis Akar Masalah terhadap Rendahnya Hasil Belajar Menulis Teks Deskripsi Siswa Kelas IV SD

This study aims to identify and understand the root causes of low student learning outcomes in writing descriptive texts in grade IV of elementary school. Based on the results of field observations, it was found that the majority of students scored below the Minimum Completion Criteria (KKM) in both cognitive and psychomotor aspects. In addition, student participation in learning activities is also relatively low, which is reflected in minimal interaction, lack of discipline, and lack of self-expression. This study uses a descriptive method with a qualitative approach, using observations in the form of tests and documentation as data collection techniques. The results of the study indicate that lack of understanding of the structure and characteristics of descriptive texts, interaction in learning, challenges in using learning media, and low student motivation are dominant factors in decreasing the quality of learning outcomes. Other factors are low interest in reading and limited student vocabulary. This study recommends that learning be carried out with a more communicative, applicable, and meaningful approach according to the characteristics of students in elementary schools.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
BLAZE Jurnal Bahasa dan Sastra dalam Pendidikan Linguistik dan Pengembangan
Published
2025-06-24
DOI
https://doi.org/10.59841/blaze.v3i3.2928
Primary Topic
STEM Education
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Analisis Akar Masalah terhadap Rendahnya Hasil Belajar Menulis Teks Deskripsi Siswa Kelas IV SD

Salmaini Safitri Syam, Syifa Auliani, Chandra Chandra
BLAZE Jurnal Bahasa dan Sastra dalam Pendidikan Linguistik dan Pengembangan
STEM Education
article

Analisis Akar Masalah terhadap Rendahnya Hasil Belajar Menulis Teks Deskripsi Siswa Kelas IV SD

Salmaini Safitri Syam, Syifa Auliani, Chandra Chandra
article en

Abstract

This study aims to identify and understand the root causes of low student learning outcomes in writing descriptive texts in grade IV of elementary school. Based on the results of field observations, it was found that the majority of students scored below the Minimum Completion Criteria (KKM) in both cognitive and psychomotor aspects. In addition, student participation in learning activities is also relatively low, which is reflected in minimal interaction, lack of discipline, and lack of self-expression. This study uses a descriptive method with a qualitative approach, using observations in the form of tests and documentation as data collection techniques. The results of the study indicate that lack of understanding of the structure and characteristics of descriptive texts, interaction in learning, challenges in using learning media, and low student motivation are dominant factors in decreasing the quality of learning outcomes. Other factors are low interest in reading and limited student vocabulary. This study recommends that learning be carried out with a more communicative, applicable, and meaningful approach according to the characteristics of students in elementary schools.

BLAZE Jurnal Bahasa dan Sastra dalam Pendidikan Linguistik dan PengembanganVol. 3(3)
Openalex Percentile: Top 71%
STEM Education
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Analisis Akar Masalah terhadap Rendahnya Hasil Belajar Menulis Teks Deskripsi Siswa Kelas IV SD — Salmaini Safitri Syam, Syifa Auliani, et al. · BLAZE Jurnal Bahasa dan Sastra dalam Pendidikan Linguistik dan Pengembangan (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS