HOW THE SOVIET PAST AFFECTS THE NATION-BUILDING OF MODERN KAZAKHSTAN

This article analyzes the role of monuments in the process of ethnic nation-building in Kazakhstan. The study is based on a database of 226 monuments erected between 1991 and 2019 in the country's regional centers. The main focus is on the question: which historical figures become national symbols that go beyond the native territories of their zhuzes and clans? The results show that the vast majority of such monuments are dedicated to personalities of the Soviet period or those whose symbolic significance was formed during the Soviet era. This indicates the continuing influence of the Soviet nation-building project, which created a single pantheon of heroes contributing to the formation of a national identity. At the same time, the practice of perpetuating representatives of “their” zhuzes and clans, reflecting local identities and the activity of tribal associations, persists in the regions. Thus, monuments act as an arena of symbolic politics, where the interests of the central government and local elites intersect. The findings highlight the dual nature of symbolic politics: on the one hand, monuments can be a tool for integration, while on the other hand, they can contribute to strengthening localism and generic differentiation.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
GUMILYOV JOURNAL OF SOCIOLOGY
Published
2025-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.32523/3080-1702-2025-152-3-64-71
Primary Topic
Soviet and Russian History
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

HOW THE SOVIET PAST AFFECTS THE NATION-BUILDING OF MODERN KAZAKHSTAN

K.N. Rodionova, Zhaxylyk Sabitov
GUMILYOV JOURNAL OF SOCIOLOGY
Soviet and Russian History
article

HOW THE SOVIET PAST AFFECTS THE NATION-BUILDING OF MODERN KAZAKHSTAN

K.N. Rodionova, Zhaxylyk Sabitov
article en

Abstract

This article analyzes the role of monuments in the process of ethnic nation-building in Kazakhstan. The study is based on a database of 226 monuments erected between 1991 and 2019 in the country's regional centers. The main focus is on the question: which historical figures become national symbols that go beyond the native territories of their zhuzes and clans? The results show that the vast majority of such monuments are dedicated to personalities of the Soviet period or those whose symbolic significance was formed during the Soviet era. This indicates the continuing influence of the Soviet nation-building project, which created a single pantheon of heroes contributing to the formation of a national identity. At the same time, the practice of perpetuating representatives of “their” zhuzes and clans, reflecting local identities and the activity of tribal associations, persists in the regions. Thus, monuments act as an arena of symbolic politics, where the interests of the central government and local elites intersect. The findings highlight the dual nature of symbolic politics: on the one hand, monuments can be a tool for integration, while on the other hand, they can contribute to strengthening localism and generic differentiation.

GUMILYOV JOURNAL OF SOCIOLOGYVol. 152(3)
L. N. Gumilyov Eurasian National University (KZ)
Openalex Percentile: Top 68%
Soviet and Russian History
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.