The compatibility of the law “On Social Security in the Republic of Albania” with the European Convention on Human Rights

This research examined the compatibility of Albanian social security legislation with both the Constitution of the Republic of Albania and the European Convention on Human Rights, focusing specifically on the legal issues that arose following the landmark “Dauti v. Albania” case. Using legal-normative analysis and comparative legal assessment, in this pivotal case, the European Court of Human Rights determined that Albania violated Article 6 of the Convention by denying effective judicial review of Medical Commission decisions on disability benefits. The study analyses Law No. 7703 “On Social Security in the Republic of Albania” and its amendments through Law No. 10447, which were implemented in response to the European Convention on Human Rights decision. Despite the Committee of Foreign Ministers of the Council of Europe issuing a report stating these amendments had addressed the Courtʼs findings, the research reveals that significant compatibility issues persist. The Administrative College of the High Court of Albania later determined that despite the legislative changes, the lawʼs incompatibility with Article 6 of the Convention continues, referring the matter to the Constitutional Court for an incidental review. This case ultimately resulted in a unifying decision of substantial importance in Albanian judicial practice, with the High Court affirming that access to courts for disabled persons must be guaranteed regardless of any legislative limitations. The research identified ongoing gaps in three categories: structural (imperfect appointment mechanisms for Appeals Commission members), procedural (inequality of arms and limited accessibility), and substantive (inconsistent standards for reviewing medical determinations). The study concluded that while formal amendments have been made, Albania must implement further reforms to ensure the practical effectiveness of judicial protection in social security cases, particularly for vulnerable groups such as persons with disabilities

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Social & Legal Studios
Published
2025-05-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.32518/sals2.2025.226
Primary Topic
European and International Law Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The compatibility of the law “On Social Security in the Republic of Albania” with the European Convention on Human Rights

Griselda Muhametaj Guma, Etien Isak
Social & Legal Studios
European and International Law Studies
article

The compatibility of the law “On Social Security in the Republic of Albania” with the European Convention on Human Rights

Griselda Muhametaj Guma, Etien Isak
article en

Abstract

This research examined the compatibility of Albanian social security legislation with both the Constitution of the Republic of Albania and the European Convention on Human Rights, focusing specifically on the legal issues that arose following the landmark “Dauti v. Albania” case. Using legal-normative analysis and comparative legal assessment, in this pivotal case, the European Court of Human Rights determined that Albania violated Article 6 of the Convention by denying effective judicial review of Medical Commission decisions on disability benefits. The study analyses Law No. 7703 “On Social Security in the Republic of Albania” and its amendments through Law No. 10447, which were implemented in response to the European Convention on Human Rights decision. Despite the Committee of Foreign Ministers of the Council of Europe issuing a report stating these amendments had addressed the Courtʼs findings, the research reveals that significant compatibility issues persist. The Administrative College of the High Court of Albania later determined that despite the legislative changes, the lawʼs incompatibility with Article 6 of the Convention continues, referring the matter to the Constitutional Court for an incidental review. This case ultimately resulted in a unifying decision of substantial importance in Albanian judicial practice, with the High Court affirming that access to courts for disabled persons must be guaranteed regardless of any legislative limitations. The research identified ongoing gaps in three categories: structural (imperfect appointment mechanisms for Appeals Commission members), procedural (inequality of arms and limited accessibility), and substantive (inconsistent standards for reviewing medical determinations). The study concluded that while formal amendments have been made, Albania must implement further reforms to ensure the practical effectiveness of judicial protection in social security cases, particularly for vulnerable groups such as persons with disabilities

Social & Legal Studios
Openalex Percentile: Top 68%
European and International Law Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.