Premixed flame quenching distance between cold walls: Effects of flow and Lewis number

This study investigates the critical conditions for flame propagation in channels with cold walls. We analyse the impact of the Lewis number and flow amplitude ( A ) on the minimum channel width required to sustain a premixed flame. Our results span a wide range of Lewis numbers, encompassing both aiding and opposing flow conditions. Results are presented for both variable and constant density models. A combined numerical approach, involving stationary and time-dependent simulations, is employed to determine quenching distances and solution stability. We find that smaller Lewis numbers and aiding flows ( A < 0 ) facilitate flame propagation in narrower channels, while opposing flows ( A > 0 ) tend to destabilise the flame, promoting asymmetric solutions. For sufficiently large positive values of A , the quenching distance is determined by asymmetric solutions, rather than the typical symmetric ones.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Proceedings of the Combustion Institute
Published
2025-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proci.2025.105836
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Combustion and flame dynamics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.67
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Premixed flame quenching distance between cold walls: Effects of flow and Lewis number

Aiden Kelly, Prabakaran Rajamanickam, Joe͏̈l Daou, Vadim N. Kurdyumov et al.
2 citations
Proceedings of the Combustion Institute
Combustion and flame dynamics
2.67
article

Premixed flame quenching distance between cold walls: Effects of flow and Lewis number

Aiden Kelly, Prabakaran Rajamanickam, Joe͏̈l Daou, Vadim N. Kurdyumov, Rémi Daou
article en
2 citations

Abstract

This study investigates the critical conditions for flame propagation in channels with cold walls. We analyse the impact of the Lewis number and flow amplitude ( A ) on the minimum channel width required to sustain a premixed flame. Our results span a wide range of Lewis numbers, encompassing both aiding and opposing flow conditions. Results are presented for both variable and constant density models. A combined numerical approach, involving stationary and time-dependent simulations, is employed to determine quenching distances and solution stability. We find that smaller Lewis numbers and aiding flows ( A < 0 ) facilitate flame propagation in narrower channels, while opposing flows ( A > 0 ) tend to destabilise the flame, promoting asymmetric solutions. For sufficiently large positive values of A , the quenching distance is determined by asymmetric solutions, rather than the typical symmetric ones.

Proceedings of the Combustion InstituteVol. 41
University of Strathclyde (GB), Saint Joseph University (LB), University of Manchester (GB), Unidades Centrales Científico-Técnicas (ES)
Openalex Percentile: Top 10%
Combustion and flame dynamics
2.67
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.