Social and legal consequences of Ukraine’s ratification of the Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court

Although the International Criminal Court opened an investigation when russia launched its aggression against Ukraine, numerous obstacles still hinder the restoration of justice and complicate the prosecution of those responsible. This study aimed to examine the challenges of harmonising domestic criminal and procedural law with international norms in the light of the social and legal repercussions of ratification. The research applied doctrinal, institutional and normative and legal analyses, together with comparative methods and case studies. The findings showed that, even though Ukraine’s journey towards full membership of the Rome Statute culminated in ratification, effective harmonisation of national legislation remains incomplete. One explanation identified is inaccuracy in the official Ukrainian translation of the Statute. Consequently, several issues have emerged, including a legislative narrowing of the recognised forms of genocide and the incorrect use of formulaic expressions such as “crimes against humaneness”, among others. The study identified specific features of detention and captivity arising from differing legal grounds that determine the status of such individuals under the norms of international humanitarian law. It was concluded that the proper regulated operation of Joint Investigation Teams is essential for the admissibility of collected evidence, particularly concerning the qualification of the individuals involved, whose professional competence is crucial. It was demonstrated that the use of open-source digital information in the documentation of international crimes must comply not only with the Berkeley Protocol but also with the requirements of jurisdictional and national admissibility. The practical value of this research lies in its potential to serve as a reference point for national legislators in the pursuit of thorough and proportionate legal harmonisation, as well as for courts and other law enforcement bodies

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Social & Legal Studios
Published
2025-05-31
DOI
https://doi.org/10.32518/sals2.2025.262
Primary Topic
International Law and Human Rights
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Social and legal consequences of Ukraine’s ratification of the Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court

Олександр Drozdov, Serhii Shulhin, Olena Drozdova, Iryna Basysta et al.
Social & Legal Studios
International Law and Human Rights
article

Social and legal consequences of Ukraine’s ratification of the Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court

Олександр Drozdov, Serhii Shulhin, Olena Drozdova, Iryna Basysta, V.V. Kovtun
article en

Abstract

Although the International Criminal Court opened an investigation when russia launched its aggression against Ukraine, numerous obstacles still hinder the restoration of justice and complicate the prosecution of those responsible. This study aimed to examine the challenges of harmonising domestic criminal and procedural law with international norms in the light of the social and legal repercussions of ratification. The research applied doctrinal, institutional and normative and legal analyses, together with comparative methods and case studies. The findings showed that, even though Ukraine’s journey towards full membership of the Rome Statute culminated in ratification, effective harmonisation of national legislation remains incomplete. One explanation identified is inaccuracy in the official Ukrainian translation of the Statute. Consequently, several issues have emerged, including a legislative narrowing of the recognised forms of genocide and the incorrect use of formulaic expressions such as “crimes against humaneness”, among others. The study identified specific features of detention and captivity arising from differing legal grounds that determine the status of such individuals under the norms of international humanitarian law. It was concluded that the proper regulated operation of Joint Investigation Teams is essential for the admissibility of collected evidence, particularly concerning the qualification of the individuals involved, whose professional competence is crucial. It was demonstrated that the use of open-source digital information in the documentation of international crimes must comply not only with the Berkeley Protocol but also with the requirements of jurisdictional and national admissibility. The practical value of this research lies in its potential to serve as a reference point for national legislators in the pursuit of thorough and proportionate legal harmonisation, as well as for courts and other law enforcement bodies

Social & Legal Studios
Openalex Percentile: Top 68%
International Law and Human Rights
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Social and legal consequences of Ukraine’s ratification of the Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court — Олександр Drozdov, Serhii Shulhin, et al. · Social & Legal Studios (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS