Critical Integration of Generative AI in Higher Education: Cognitive, Pedagogical and EthicalPerspectives

Generative AI is rapidly transforming higher education by reshaping cognitive processes, learning behaviors, assessment practices and instructional approaches. This study examines the impact of AI on student learning through a combination of multi-institutional evidence and a quasi-experimental assessment in an undergraduate writing course. Three central dimensions are analyzed: cognitive offloading, critical versus naïve adoption of AI, and emerging learning patterns including normalization, confirmation bias and the erosion of scaffolding. Findings reveal that AI tools can enhance grammar accuracy, research efficiency, and factual recall, while also posing risks to creativity, critical thinking, independent revision and metacognitive engagement. The study highlights the importance of structured, critically mediated integration of AI into curricula to maximize learning benefits, uphold academic integrity and support long-term skill development

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Global Journal of Human-Social Science
Published
2024-09-22
DOI
https://doi.org/10.34257/ljrhssvol25is13pg1
Primary Topic
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Critical Integration of Generative AI in Higher Education: Cognitive, Pedagogical and EthicalPerspectives

Milošević Svetlana, Polina Magda, Ahmedtelba Elycheikh
Global Journal of Human-Social Science
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
article

Critical Integration of Generative AI in Higher Education: Cognitive, Pedagogical and EthicalPerspectives

Milošević Svetlana, Polina Magda, Ahmedtelba Elycheikh
article en

Abstract

Generative AI is rapidly transforming higher education by reshaping cognitive processes, learning behaviors, assessment practices and instructional approaches. This study examines the impact of AI on student learning through a combination of multi-institutional evidence and a quasi-experimental assessment in an undergraduate writing course. Three central dimensions are analyzed: cognitive offloading, critical versus naïve adoption of AI, and emerging learning patterns including normalization, confirmation bias and the erosion of scaffolding. Findings reveal that AI tools can enhance grammar accuracy, research efficiency, and factual recall, while also posing risks to creativity, critical thinking, independent revision and metacognitive engagement. The study highlights the importance of structured, critically mediated integration of AI into curricula to maximize learning benefits, uphold academic integrity and support long-term skill development

Global Journal of Human-Social Science
Openalex Percentile: Top 64%
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Critical Integration of Generative AI in Higher Education: Cognitive, Pedagogical and EthicalPerspectives — Milošević Svetlana, Polina Magda, et al. · Global Journal of Human-Social Science (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS