Nietzsche Postanalytic? Moral Psychology, Philosophical Naturalism, and the Return of Metaphysics

Abstract Virtually all of the volumes under discussion in this essay accept that Nietzsche’s philosophical project is of a naturalistic kind. Where they differ is with regard to a) the extent and orientation of such naturalism, b) the import of such naturalism with regard to Nietzsche’s critique of morality, c) philosophy’s relationship to the natural sciences, and d) the potential metaphysical underpinnings of Nietzsche’s naturalism. Although most, albeit not all, of the contributions discussed in this review essay situate themselves in the tradition of analytic philosophy, I will argue that the debate about Nietzsche’s naturalism, and also about the nature of Nietzsche’s specific way of doing philosophy, opens the door to a postanalytic perspective. Against this background, the unproductive distinction between “analytic” and “continental” interpretations of Nietzsche’s writings thankfully begins to lose relevance.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Nietzsche Studien
Published
2024-11-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1515/nietzstu-2025-0021
Primary Topic
Nietzsche, Schopenhauer, and Hegel
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Nietzsche Postanalytic? Moral Psychology, Philosophical Naturalism, and the Return of Metaphysics

Christian J. Emden
Nietzsche Studien
Nietzsche, Schopenhauer, and Hegel
article

Nietzsche Postanalytic? Moral Psychology, Philosophical Naturalism, and the Return of Metaphysics

Christian J. Emden
article en

Abstract

Abstract Virtually all of the volumes under discussion in this essay accept that Nietzsche’s philosophical project is of a naturalistic kind. Where they differ is with regard to a) the extent and orientation of such naturalism, b) the import of such naturalism with regard to Nietzsche’s critique of morality, c) philosophy’s relationship to the natural sciences, and d) the potential metaphysical underpinnings of Nietzsche’s naturalism. Although most, albeit not all, of the contributions discussed in this review essay situate themselves in the tradition of analytic philosophy, I will argue that the debate about Nietzsche’s naturalism, and also about the nature of Nietzsche’s specific way of doing philosophy, opens the door to a postanalytic perspective. Against this background, the unproductive distinction between “analytic” and “continental” interpretations of Nietzsche’s writings thankfully begins to lose relevance.

Nietzsche StudienVol. 54(1)
Rice University (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 50%
Nietzsche, Schopenhauer, and Hegel
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Nietzsche Postanalytic? Moral Psychology, Philosophical Naturalism, and the Return of Metaphysics — Christian J. Emden · Nietzsche Studien (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS