Regulations for evidentiary activity in simplified and accelerated forms of judicial proceedings

Regarding the simplified and accelerated form of criminal proceedings, the rules of evidence were dis-cussed, including the question of when and in what order the judge can establish the guilt of the accused. The shortcomings of the norms of criminal procedural law that hinder their understanding and interpretation by law enforcement officials are highlighted. The common shift in the theoretical and practical study of the court’s ex-amination of the evidence underlying the indictment from the trial stage to the preliminary hearing stage has been critically analyzed. The legal positions of the Plenum of the Supreme Court of the Russian Federation and the Constitutional Court of the Russian Federation on the issues under consideration have been used. It is pro-posed in Article 316 of the Code of Criminal Procedure of the Russian Federation to indicate the judge’s obliga-tion to indirectly examine the evidence on which the indictment is based. Other proposals have also been formu-lated to improve the law regarding the regulation of evidentiary activities in the form of judicial proceedings un-der consideration.

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Current Issues of the State and Law
Published
2025-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.20310/2587-9340-2025-9-3-436-443
Primary Topic
Education, Law, and Society
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Regulations for evidentiary activity in simplified and accelerated forms of judicial proceedings

Current Issues of the State and Law
Education, Law, and Society
article

Regulations for evidentiary activity in simplified and accelerated forms of judicial proceedings

article en

Abstract

Regarding the simplified and accelerated form of criminal proceedings, the rules of evidence were dis-cussed, including the question of when and in what order the judge can establish the guilt of the accused. The shortcomings of the norms of criminal procedural law that hinder their understanding and interpretation by law enforcement officials are highlighted. The common shift in the theoretical and practical study of the court’s ex-amination of the evidence underlying the indictment from the trial stage to the preliminary hearing stage has been critically analyzed. The legal positions of the Plenum of the Supreme Court of the Russian Federation and the Constitutional Court of the Russian Federation on the issues under consideration have been used. It is pro-posed in Article 316 of the Code of Criminal Procedure of the Russian Federation to indicate the judge’s obliga-tion to indirectly examine the evidence on which the indictment is based. Other proposals have also been formu-lated to improve the law regarding the regulation of evidentiary activities in the form of judicial proceedings un-der consideration.

Current Issues of the State and Law
Federal Penitentiary Service (RU)
Openalex Percentile: Top 68%
Education, Law, and Society
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Regulations for evidentiary activity in simplified and accelerated forms of judicial proceedings · Current Issues of the State and Law (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS