Comparison of Intraoperative and Postoperative Outcomes of Interval Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy With and Without Prior Percutaneous Cholecystostomy in Patients with Acute Cholecystitis

Background: Acute cholecystitis (AC) is a common surgical emergency in Pakistan. Laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) is the standard treatment, but percutaneous cholecystostomy (PC) is often used in high-risk patients as a temporizing measure before interval LC. The impact of prior PC on operative and postoperative outcomes in our setting remains unclear. The study aimed to compare intraoperative and postoperative outcomes of interval LC performed with and without prior PC in patients with AC. Methods: This comparative observational study at CMH Lahore (Dec 2024–July 2025) included 120 patients: Group A (LC without prior PC, n = 60) and Group B (LC with prior PC, n = 60). Outcomes included operative time, adhesion severity, subtotal cholecystectomy rates, conversion rates, recovery parameters, and postoperative complications. Statistical analyses used Chi-square and Mann–Whitney U tests, with p < 0.05 considered significant. Results: Group B patients were significantly older (58.3 ± 10.5 vs 45.6 ± 11.2 years, p < 0.001) and had a higher proportion of ASA II–III status (60.0% vs 33.3%, p = 0.004) compared to Group A. Operative time was shorter in Group B (65.4 ± 12.5 vs 78.9 ± 15.6 minutes, p < 0.001), with fewer cases of severe adhesions (6.7% vs 33.3%, p < 0.001) and a lower rate of subtotal cholecystectomy (3.3% vs 13.3%, p = 0.048). Recovery was faster in Group B, with earlier oral intake, shorter hospital stays (2.8 ± 1.0 vs 4.5 ± 1.4 days, p < 0.001), and lower—but not statistically significant—overall complication rates (5.0% vs 13.3%, p = 0.098). Conclusion: Prior PC in AC patients was associated with reduced operative difficulty, fewer severe adhesions, shorter operative time, faster postoperative recovery, and fewer complications, although differences in complication rates were not statistically significant. PC remains a safe and effective bridging intervention for selected high-risk patients when immediate LC is not feasible.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Pakistan Journal of Medicine and Dentistry
Published
2025-09-29
DOI
https://doi.org/10.36283/ziun-pjmd14-4/011
Primary Topic
Gallbladder and Bile Duct Disorders
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Comparison of Intraoperative and Postoperative Outcomes of Interval Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy With and Without Prior Percutaneous Cholecystostomy in Patients with Acute Cholecystitis

Muhammad Waleed Khan, Muhammad Talha Khan, Shahid Majeed, Raheel Khan
Pakistan Journal of Medicine and Dentistry
Gallbladder and Bile Duct Disorders
article

Comparison of Intraoperative and Postoperative Outcomes of Interval Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy With and Without Prior Percutaneous Cholecystostomy in Patients with Acute Cholecystitis

Muhammad Waleed Khan, Muhammad Talha Khan, Shahid Majeed, Raheel Khan
article en

Abstract

Background: Acute cholecystitis (AC) is a common surgical emergency in Pakistan. Laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) is the standard treatment, but percutaneous cholecystostomy (PC) is often used in high-risk patients as a temporizing measure before interval LC. The impact of prior PC on operative and postoperative outcomes in our setting remains unclear. The study aimed to compare intraoperative and postoperative outcomes of interval LC performed with and without prior PC in patients with AC. Methods: This comparative observational study at CMH Lahore (Dec 2024–July 2025) included 120 patients: Group A (LC without prior PC, n = 60) and Group B (LC with prior PC, n = 60). Outcomes included operative time, adhesion severity, subtotal cholecystectomy rates, conversion rates, recovery parameters, and postoperative complications. Statistical analyses used Chi-square and Mann–Whitney U tests, with p < 0.05 considered significant. Results: Group B patients were significantly older (58.3 ± 10.5 vs 45.6 ± 11.2 years, p < 0.001) and had a higher proportion of ASA II–III status (60.0% vs 33.3%, p = 0.004) compared to Group A. Operative time was shorter in Group B (65.4 ± 12.5 vs 78.9 ± 15.6 minutes, p < 0.001), with fewer cases of severe adhesions (6.7% vs 33.3%, p < 0.001) and a lower rate of subtotal cholecystectomy (3.3% vs 13.3%, p = 0.048). Recovery was faster in Group B, with earlier oral intake, shorter hospital stays (2.8 ± 1.0 vs 4.5 ± 1.4 days, p < 0.001), and lower—but not statistically significant—overall complication rates (5.0% vs 13.3%, p = 0.098). Conclusion: Prior PC in AC patients was associated with reduced operative difficulty, fewer severe adhesions, shorter operative time, faster postoperative recovery, and fewer complications, although differences in complication rates were not statistically significant. PC remains a safe and effective bridging intervention for selected high-risk patients when immediate LC is not feasible.

Pakistan Journal of Medicine and DentistryVol. 14(4)
CMH Lahore Medical College and Institute of Dentistry (PK)
Openalex Percentile: Top 61%
Gallbladder and Bile Duct Disorders
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.