Comparing Perioperative Outcomes of Total Intravenous Anesthesia (TIVA) With Volatile Anesthesia in General Surgical Patients in a Tertiary Hospital of Bangladesh

Background: The choice of anesthetic technique influences perioperative outcomes significantly with Total Intravenous Anesthesia (TIVA) and volatile anesthesia being the most common methods in general surgery. Objective: This study compares the perioperative outcomes of TIVA and volatile anesthesia in general surgical patients at Uttara Adhunik Medical College Hospital, Bangladesh, to determine which method results in better recovery and fewer complications. Methods: A total of 120 general surgical patients (60 per group) were randomly assigned to receive either TIVA or volatile anesthesia. Data was collected on emergence time, postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV), recovery time, and hemodynamic stability. The outcomes were compared using statistical analysis (paired t-test, p-value < 0.05) and standard deviation to assess variability. Results: The TIVA group demonstrated a significantly faster emergence time with a mean of 8.3 ± 1.5 minutes compared to 12.1 ± 2.4 minutes in the volatile anesthesia group (p-value = 0.003). The incidence of PONV was lower in the TIVA group, with only 16% of patients experiencing nausea, compared to 36% in the volatile group (p-value = 0.02). Recovery room stay duration was also significantly shorter for the TIVA group (45.2 ± 9.1 minutes) versus the volatile group (56.5 ± 11.2 minutes), with a p-value of 0.04. Blood pressure fluctuations were significantly more stable in the TIVA group, showing a standard deviation of ±5.2 mmHg, while the volatile group had a higher fluctuation at ±7.6 mmHg (p-value = 0.01). Additionally, the TIVA group required 35% fewer rescue analgesics (p-value = 0.02). Conclusion: TIVA offers superior perioperative outcomes in terms of emergence time, recovery, postoperative complications, and hemodynamic stability compared to volatile anesthesia in general surgical patients at a tertiary hospital.

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Barind Medical College Journal
Published
2025-06-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.70818/bmcj.v011i01.0201
Primary Topic
Anesthesia and Sedative Agents
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Comparing Perioperative Outcomes of Total Intravenous Anesthesia (TIVA) With Volatile Anesthesia in General Surgical Patients in a Tertiary Hospital of Bangladesh

Barind Medical College Journal
Anesthesia and Sedative Agents
article

Comparing Perioperative Outcomes of Total Intravenous Anesthesia (TIVA) With Volatile Anesthesia in General Surgical Patients in a Tertiary Hospital of Bangladesh

article en

Abstract

Background: The choice of anesthetic technique influences perioperative outcomes significantly with Total Intravenous Anesthesia (TIVA) and volatile anesthesia being the most common methods in general surgery. Objective: This study compares the perioperative outcomes of TIVA and volatile anesthesia in general surgical patients at Uttara Adhunik Medical College Hospital, Bangladesh, to determine which method results in better recovery and fewer complications. Methods: A total of 120 general surgical patients (60 per group) were randomly assigned to receive either TIVA or volatile anesthesia. Data was collected on emergence time, postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV), recovery time, and hemodynamic stability. The outcomes were compared using statistical analysis (paired t-test, p-value < 0.05) and standard deviation to assess variability. Results: The TIVA group demonstrated a significantly faster emergence time with a mean of 8.3 ± 1.5 minutes compared to 12.1 ± 2.4 minutes in the volatile anesthesia group (p-value = 0.003). The incidence of PONV was lower in the TIVA group, with only 16% of patients experiencing nausea, compared to 36% in the volatile group (p-value = 0.02). Recovery room stay duration was also significantly shorter for the TIVA group (45.2 ± 9.1 minutes) versus the volatile group (56.5 ± 11.2 minutes), with a p-value of 0.04. Blood pressure fluctuations were significantly more stable in the TIVA group, showing a standard deviation of ±5.2 mmHg, while the volatile group had a higher fluctuation at ±7.6 mmHg (p-value = 0.01). Additionally, the TIVA group required 35% fewer rescue analgesics (p-value = 0.02). Conclusion: TIVA offers superior perioperative outcomes in terms of emergence time, recovery, postoperative complications, and hemodynamic stability compared to volatile anesthesia in general surgical patients at a tertiary hospital.

Barind Medical College JournalVol. 11(1)
Khyber Medical College (PK), University of Dhaka (BD), San Diego Cardiac Center (US), Square Hospitals (BD), Bedford Hospital (GB), East West University (BD), Dhaka Medical College and Hospital (BD)
Openalex Percentile: Top 57%
Anesthesia and Sedative Agents
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.