Diagnostic Accuracy of Contrast-Enhanced MRI in Detection of Ovarian Malignant Masses

Characterizing indeterminate adnexal masses remains a clinical challenge. Contrast-enhanced MRI (CE-MRI) may enhance the discrimination between benign and malignant ovarian lesions, thereby refining surgical triage. Objective: To determine the diagnostic accuracy of CE-MRI for detecting ovarian malignancy using histopathology as the reference standard. Methods: We conducted an observational study over six months, commencing from June 2024 to December 2024, at a tertiary referral center (Department of Radiology, JPMC, Karachi). Consecutive women (≥18 years) with suspected ovarian masses underwent standardized pelvic CE-MRI (multiparametric protocol with dynamic contrast enhancement). Imaging features (size, shape, septations/solid components, enhancement pattern, necrosis) and an overall CE-MRI impression (benign vs malignant) were recorded. All patients proceeded to definitive surgery; histopathology (malignant vs benign, subtype, grade) served as the Gold standard. Diagnostic performance metrics (sensitivity, specificity, PPV, NPV, accuracy) were calculated from 2×2 tables; ROC analysis quantified discrimination. Results: A total of 152 women were included (mean age 47.05 ± 11.28 years; symptom duration 8.69 ± 4.11 weeks). Mean lesion size was 8.54 ± 3.31 cm on baseline imaging and 7.93 ± 3.12 cm on CE-MRI. CE-MRI impressions were malignant in 75 (49.3%) cases; histopathology confirmed malignancy in 73 (48.0%). The 2×2 table yielded 66 true positives, nine false positives, 70 true negatives, and seven false negatives. CE-MRI demonstrated sensitivity 90.4%, specificity 88.6%, PPV 88.0%, NPV 90.9%, and overall accuracy 89.5%. ROC analysis showed strong discrimination (AUC 0.895, p < 0.0001). Conclusion: In a real-world referral cohort, CE-MRI demonstrated high diagnostic accuracy in differentiating malignant from benign ovarian masses, with excellent sensitivity and specificity, and an AUC approaching 0.90. CE-MRI thus provides robust second-line problem-solving after initial imaging and supports informed surgical planning.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Biological and Clinical Sciences Research Journal
Published
2025-06-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.54112/bcsrj.v6i6.1972
Primary Topic
Radiomics and Machine Learning in Medical Imaging
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Diagnostic Accuracy of Contrast-Enhanced MRI in Detection of Ovarian Malignant Masses

Shaista Shoukat, Sumera Shahbaz, Abdul Samad, Sanjana et al.
Biological and Clinical Sciences Research Journal
Radiomics and Machine Learning in Medical Imaging
article

Diagnostic Accuracy of Contrast-Enhanced MRI in Detection of Ovarian Malignant Masses

Shaista Shoukat, Sumera Shahbaz, Abdul Samad, Sanjana, Varsha Varsha, Piriha Nisar
article en

Abstract

Characterizing indeterminate adnexal masses remains a clinical challenge. Contrast-enhanced MRI (CE-MRI) may enhance the discrimination between benign and malignant ovarian lesions, thereby refining surgical triage. Objective: To determine the diagnostic accuracy of CE-MRI for detecting ovarian malignancy using histopathology as the reference standard. Methods: We conducted an observational study over six months, commencing from June 2024 to December 2024, at a tertiary referral center (Department of Radiology, JPMC, Karachi). Consecutive women (≥18 years) with suspected ovarian masses underwent standardized pelvic CE-MRI (multiparametric protocol with dynamic contrast enhancement). Imaging features (size, shape, septations/solid components, enhancement pattern, necrosis) and an overall CE-MRI impression (benign vs malignant) were recorded. All patients proceeded to definitive surgery; histopathology (malignant vs benign, subtype, grade) served as the Gold standard. Diagnostic performance metrics (sensitivity, specificity, PPV, NPV, accuracy) were calculated from 2×2 tables; ROC analysis quantified discrimination. Results: A total of 152 women were included (mean age 47.05 ± 11.28 years; symptom duration 8.69 ± 4.11 weeks). Mean lesion size was 8.54 ± 3.31 cm on baseline imaging and 7.93 ± 3.12 cm on CE-MRI. CE-MRI impressions were malignant in 75 (49.3%) cases; histopathology confirmed malignancy in 73 (48.0%). The 2×2 table yielded 66 true positives, nine false positives, 70 true negatives, and seven false negatives. CE-MRI demonstrated sensitivity 90.4%, specificity 88.6%, PPV 88.0%, NPV 90.9%, and overall accuracy 89.5%. ROC analysis showed strong discrimination (AUC 0.895, p < 0.0001). Conclusion: In a real-world referral cohort, CE-MRI demonstrated high diagnostic accuracy in differentiating malignant from benign ovarian masses, with excellent sensitivity and specificity, and an AUC approaching 0.90. CE-MRI thus provides robust second-line problem-solving after initial imaging and supports informed surgical planning.

Biological and Clinical Sciences Research JournalVol. 6(6)
Jinnah Postgraduate Medical Center (PK)
Openalex Percentile: Top 59%
Radiomics and Machine Learning in Medical Imaging
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.