LEGAL CONSEQUENCES OF UNILATERAL REVOCATION OF A POWER OF ATTORNEY BY A CLIENT FROM THE PERSPECTIVE OF A RECIPIENT AGREEMENT IN THE GRANTING OF POWER OF ATTORNEY TO SETTLE CIVIL CASES IN COURT

Representative institutions are widely used in practice because they can facilitate the journey through legal traffic. This representation gives rise to the giving of orders and the person who has been given power of attorney can carry out the legal act on behalf of the person who gave the power of attorney or it can also be said that he represents the principal acting in law. This means that what he does is at the expense of the principal and all his rights and obligations arising from the actions he does become the rights and obligations of the person who gave the power of attorney. The formulation of the problem in this study is how the legal regulation of the power of attorney agreement for the settlement of civil cases in court, what is the legal responsibility if one party defaults in the power of attorney agreement for the settlement of civil cases in court, what are the legal consequences of unilateral revocation of the power of attorney in the power of attorney agreement for the settlement of civil cases in court from the perspective of a reciprocal agreement.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Jurnal Meta Hukum
Published
2024-11-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.47652/metahukum.v3i3.723
Primary Topic
Legal Studies and Policies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

LEGAL CONSEQUENCES OF UNILATERAL REVOCATION OF A POWER OF ATTORNEY BY A CLIENT FROM THE PERSPECTIVE OF A RECIPIENT AGREEMENT IN THE GRANTING OF POWER OF ATTORNEY TO SETTLE CIVIL CASES IN COURT

Dani Sintara, Syarah Aisha
Jurnal Meta Hukum
Legal Studies and Policies
article

LEGAL CONSEQUENCES OF UNILATERAL REVOCATION OF A POWER OF ATTORNEY BY A CLIENT FROM THE PERSPECTIVE OF A RECIPIENT AGREEMENT IN THE GRANTING OF POWER OF ATTORNEY TO SETTLE CIVIL CASES IN COURT

Dani Sintara, Syarah Aisha
article en

Abstract

Representative institutions are widely used in practice because they can facilitate the journey through legal traffic. This representation gives rise to the giving of orders and the person who has been given power of attorney can carry out the legal act on behalf of the person who gave the power of attorney or it can also be said that he represents the principal acting in law. This means that what he does is at the expense of the principal and all his rights and obligations arising from the actions he does become the rights and obligations of the person who gave the power of attorney. The formulation of the problem in this study is how the legal regulation of the power of attorney agreement for the settlement of civil cases in court, what is the legal responsibility if one party defaults in the power of attorney agreement for the settlement of civil cases in court, what are the legal consequences of unilateral revocation of the power of attorney in the power of attorney agreement for the settlement of civil cases in court from the perspective of a reciprocal agreement.

Jurnal Meta HukumVol. 3(3)
Openalex Percentile: Top 41%
Legal Studies and Policies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

LEGAL CONSEQUENCES OF UNILATERAL REVOCATION OF A POWER OF ATTORNEY BY A CLIENT FROM THE PERSPECTIVE OF A RECIPIENT AGREEMENT IN THE GRANTING OF POWER OF ATTORNEY TO SETTLE CIVIL CASES IN COURT — Dani Sintara, Syarah Aisha · Jurnal Meta Hukum (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS