Autonomous Vehicles, Urban Deployment, and Welfare Effects

ABSTRACT This paper provides a theoretical analysis of the effects of autonomous vehicles (AVs) on the spatial structures of future cities. We consider two types of AVs, private AVs (PAVs) and shared AVs (SAVs). We assume that AVs have a lower marginal travel time cost than human‐driven traditional vehicles (TVs) due to additional utility caused by free activities in AVs, and PAVs have a lower marginal travel time cost than SAVs due to better privacy, convenience, and comfort. Two urban spatial models are presented and compared: one focusing on a city with only TVs and the other on a city with mixed PAVs and SAVs. Both models account for land competition among firm production, household residence, and parking. The optimal residential lot size and the optimal SAV market share are determined, with an objective of maximizing social welfare. The findings show that introducing AVs may lead the city size to expand or shrink, and both the social welfare and the total congestion cost to increase or decrease, depending on the maturity degree of AV technology and the SAV market share.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Regional Science
Published
2026-08-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/jors.70089
Primary Topic
Transportation and Mobility Innovations
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Autonomous Vehicles, Urban Deployment, and Welfare Effects

Takao Dantsuji, Yuki Takayama, Zhichun Li, Wenjing Liu et al.
Journal of Regional Science
Transportation and Mobility Innovations
article

Autonomous Vehicles, Urban Deployment, and Welfare Effects

Takao Dantsuji, Yuki Takayama, Zhichun Li, Wenjing Liu, André de Palma
article en

Abstract

ABSTRACT This paper provides a theoretical analysis of the effects of autonomous vehicles (AVs) on the spatial structures of future cities. We consider two types of AVs, private AVs (PAVs) and shared AVs (SAVs). We assume that AVs have a lower marginal travel time cost than human‐driven traditional vehicles (TVs) due to additional utility caused by free activities in AVs, and PAVs have a lower marginal travel time cost than SAVs due to better privacy, convenience, and comfort. Two urban spatial models are presented and compared: one focusing on a city with only TVs and the other on a city with mixed PAVs and SAVs. Both models account for land competition among firm production, household residence, and parking. The optimal residential lot size and the optimal SAV market share are determined, with an objective of maximizing social welfare. The findings show that introducing AVs may lead the city size to expand or shrink, and both the social welfare and the total congestion cost to increase or decrease, depending on the maturity degree of AV technology and the SAV market share.

Journal of Regional Science
Tokyo Institute of Technology (JP), Waseda University (JP), Tokyo Institute of Psychiatry (JP), CY Cergy Paris Université (FR), Huazhong University of Science and Technology (CN)
Agence Nationale de la Recherche, National Natural Science Foundation of China, Japan Society for the Promotion of Science, Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities
Openalex Percentile: Top 99%
Transportation and Mobility Innovations
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.