Ethics in Consumer Neuroscience: A Non-Exhaustive Presentation

Social sciences have always been subject to ethical considerations, from research to explicit use and implicit meaning of their findings; Consumer Neuroscience has vigorously developed over the last twenty years and associated ethical concerns have promptly come into the picture. As the effectiveness of the existing neuroscience tools and techniques is just being discovered by researchers in most social sciences, I hypothesize that associated ethical issues will become more prominent in the future. The current article does not attempt to provide an exhaustive view of these issues and possible solutions; it just tackles some of the most important ones differentiating between those specific to Consumer Neuroscience and those rather common for most other social sciences. From this standpoint, large differences were found when analyzing research objectives, instruments, data disclosure, and findings dissemination and use as well as participants’ protection and data privacy rights. The framework of the Neuromarketing Science and Business Association (NMSBA) proposed Code of Ethics was used as a starting point for this material, which provides a brief assessment of the current state of each principle put forward by the Code based on an extensive literature review. Although this Code’s provisions are quite similar to the ones put forward by the European Charter for Researchers of 2000, European Commission’s Ethics in Social Sciences and Humanities of 2001, and several national-level regulations, it was the first choice for this study as it comes specifically from researchers and practitioners in Consumer Neuroscience. Finally, the current paper shall argue for a balanced and realistic approach when attempting to regulate the domain, ensuring the rules effectively protect the participants and users while not unnecessarily increasing research difficulty. As Neuroscience approaches are increasingly accepted by Marketing and other social sciences, a sound and functional ethical foundation would help safe, fair, and fast advances rather than allow for abuses or constitute unnecessary impediments.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
RePEc: Research Papers in Economics
Published
2025-04-01
Primary Topic
Neuroethics, Human Enhancement, Biomedical Innovations
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Ethics in Consumer Neuroscience: A Non-Exhaustive Presentation

Dănuț TRIFU
RePEc: Research Papers in Economics
Neuroethics, Human Enhancement, Biomedical Innovations
article

Ethics in Consumer Neuroscience: A Non-Exhaustive Presentation

Dănuț TRIFU
article en

Abstract

Social sciences have always been subject to ethical considerations, from research to explicit use and implicit meaning of their findings; Consumer Neuroscience has vigorously developed over the last twenty years and associated ethical concerns have promptly come into the picture. As the effectiveness of the existing neuroscience tools and techniques is just being discovered by researchers in most social sciences, I hypothesize that associated ethical issues will become more prominent in the future. The current article does not attempt to provide an exhaustive view of these issues and possible solutions; it just tackles some of the most important ones differentiating between those specific to Consumer Neuroscience and those rather common for most other social sciences. From this standpoint, large differences were found when analyzing research objectives, instruments, data disclosure, and findings dissemination and use as well as participants’ protection and data privacy rights. The framework of the Neuromarketing Science and Business Association (NMSBA) proposed Code of Ethics was used as a starting point for this material, which provides a brief assessment of the current state of each principle put forward by the Code based on an extensive literature review. Although this Code’s provisions are quite similar to the ones put forward by the European Charter for Researchers of 2000, European Commission’s Ethics in Social Sciences and Humanities of 2001, and several national-level regulations, it was the first choice for this study as it comes specifically from researchers and practitioners in Consumer Neuroscience. Finally, the current paper shall argue for a balanced and realistic approach when attempting to regulate the domain, ensuring the rules effectively protect the participants and users while not unnecessarily increasing research difficulty. As Neuroscience approaches are increasingly accepted by Marketing and other social sciences, a sound and functional ethical foundation would help safe, fair, and fast advances rather than allow for abuses or constitute unnecessary impediments.

RePEc: Research Papers in Economics
Openalex Percentile: Top 73%
Neuroethics, Human Enhancement, Biomedical Innovations
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.