Design Comparison of Four-Layer Full-Nb<sub>3</sub>Sn and Hybrid Nb<sub>3</sub>Sn/NbTi Cos-Theta Dipoles for the CERN High Field Magnet R&amp;D Programme

The High Field Magnet (HFM) R&D programme at CERN aims to find technological solutions for the construction of accelerator magnets to be installed in future post-LHC colliders. The Italian Institute for Nuclear Physics (INFN) and CERN are collaborating to design and fabricate a new four-layer costheta dipole able to achieve a bore field of 14 T with at least 20% margin on the load-line. Two design options are under evaluation: a four-layer dipole entirely made of Nb3Sn, and a hybrid configuration combining inner Nb3Sn layers with outer NbTi layers. Both options are being assessed for feasibility as short models, with scalable design choices for longer magnet prototypes suitable for accelerator integration. This paper presents a comparative study of the performance of the two design options. The results provide insights into the trade-offs between performance, complexity, and protection constraints in the development of next-generation high-field dipole magnets. The Full-Nb3Sn solution satisfies the HFM requirements, but the Hybrid solution is a promising, cost-effective alternative that can be considered for next-generation colliders.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
IEEE Transactions on Applied Superconductivity
Published
2025-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1109/tasc.2025.3615181
Primary Topic
Superconducting Materials and Applications
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Design Comparison of Four-Layer Full-Nb3Sn and Hybrid Nb3Sn/NbTi Cos-Theta Dipoles for the CERN High Field Magnet R&D Programme

L. Rossi, Stefano Dotti, A. Gagno, Marco Prioli et al.
IEEE Transactions on Applied Superconductivity
Superconducting Materials and Applications
article

Design Comparison of Four-Layer Full-Nb3Sn and Hybrid Nb3Sn/NbTi Cos-Theta Dipoles for the CERN High Field Magnet R&D Programme

L. Rossi, Stefano Dotti, A. Gagno, Marco Prioli, S. Mariotto, Carlo Santini, A. Bersani, M. Statera, A. Pampaloni, R. U. Valente, M. Bracco, M. Sorbi, B. Caiffi, N. Sala, S. Di Stefano, S. Burioli, E. De Matteis, Daniel Novelli, E. Todesco, Enrico Beneduce, Massimiliano Cannavò, A. Foussat, Gabriele Crespi, R. Musenich, S. Farinon, T. Maiello, M. Elisei, M. Spadotto
article en

Abstract

The High Field Magnet (HFM) R&D programme at CERN aims to find technological solutions for the construction of accelerator magnets to be installed in future post-LHC colliders. The Italian Institute for Nuclear Physics (INFN) and CERN are collaborating to design and fabricate a new four-layer costheta dipole able to achieve a bore field of 14 T with at least 20% margin on the load-line. Two design options are under evaluation: a four-layer dipole entirely made of Nb3Sn, and a hybrid configuration combining inner Nb3Sn layers with outer NbTi layers. Both options are being assessed for feasibility as short models, with scalable design choices for longer magnet prototypes suitable for accelerator integration. This paper presents a comparative study of the performance of the two design options. The results provide insights into the trade-offs between performance, complexity, and protection constraints in the development of next-generation high-field dipole magnets. The Full-Nb3Sn solution satisfies the HFM requirements, but the Hybrid solution is a promising, cost-effective alternative that can be considered for next-generation colliders.

IEEE Transactions on Applied Superconductivity
University of Milan (IT), Istituto Nazionale di Fisica Nucleare, Sezione di Genova (IT), Istituto Nazionale di Fisica Nucleare, Laboratori Acceleratori e Superconduttività Applicata (IT), European Organization for Nuclear Research (CH), University of Genoa (IT), Sapienza University of Rome (IT), Politecnico di Milano (IT)
Openalex Percentile: Top 74%
Superconducting Materials and Applications
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.