Multi-Plane Comparative Study of Finger Angles and Range of Motion Using Mediapipe Pose Estimation for kinematic analysis

This study presents a comparative analysis of finger joint angles and range of motion (ROM) utilizing Mediapipe pose estimation for kinematic evaluation, based on video recordings obtained from three anatomical planes: frontal, median, and sagittal. The experimental protocol involved five healthy adult participants (2 females and 3 males, aged 20–40 years). Three synchronized cameras were employed to simultaneously capture real-time pose data from each of the three planes during the performance of a standardized drinking water task. This task required participants to move their hands from a resting position on the thighs to a table surface, grasp a glass, bring it to the mouth, return the glass to the table, and finally reposition their hands back to the thighs. Finger joint angles were continuously tracked throughout the task. Upon completion, angular data and corresponding ROM values for each finger were systematically recorded in a predefined Excel spreadsheet, and both the raw and pose-estimated video recordings were archived for further analysis. The results demonstrated that the median plane provided the most accurate and reliable measurements of finger joint angles and ROM, outperforming both the frontal and sagittal planes. These findings emphasize the utility of analyzing individual anatomical planes in kinematic studies and highlight the superior performance of the median plane in accurately capturing finger movement dynamics during functional tasks.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Published
2025-08-08
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1109/icbmesh66209.2025.11182193
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Robotic Mechanisms and Dynamics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.21
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Multi-Plane Comparative Study of Finger Angles and Range of Motion Using Mediapipe Pose Estimation for kinematic analysis

S. Meenatchi Sundaram, Senthil Kumaran D, Manikandan Natarajan, Padmavathi Shenoy
1 citations
Robotic Mechanisms and Dynamics
1.21
article

Multi-Plane Comparative Study of Finger Angles and Range of Motion Using Mediapipe Pose Estimation for kinematic analysis

S. Meenatchi Sundaram, Senthil Kumaran D, Manikandan Natarajan, Padmavathi Shenoy
article en
1 citations

Abstract

This study presents a comparative analysis of finger joint angles and range of motion (ROM) utilizing Mediapipe pose estimation for kinematic evaluation, based on video recordings obtained from three anatomical planes: frontal, median, and sagittal. The experimental protocol involved five healthy adult participants (2 females and 3 males, aged 20–40 years). Three synchronized cameras were employed to simultaneously capture real-time pose data from each of the three planes during the performance of a standardized drinking water task. This task required participants to move their hands from a resting position on the thighs to a table surface, grasp a glass, bring it to the mouth, return the glass to the table, and finally reposition their hands back to the thighs. Finger joint angles were continuously tracked throughout the task. Upon completion, angular data and corresponding ROM values for each finger were systematically recorded in a predefined Excel spreadsheet, and both the raw and pose-estimated video recordings were archived for further analysis. The results demonstrated that the median plane provided the most accurate and reliable measurements of finger joint angles and ROM, outperforming both the frontal and sagittal planes. These findings emphasize the utility of analyzing individual anatomical planes in kinematic studies and highlight the superior performance of the median plane in accurately capturing finger movement dynamics during functional tasks.

Manipal Academy of Higher Education (IN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 16%
Robotic Mechanisms and Dynamics
1.21
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.