Comparative Analysis of Machine Learning Algorithms for Arrhythmia Detection

The presented paper proposes a framework for arrhythmia classification ECG signal. The proposed framework is validated using the MIT-BIH Arrhythmia Database. The class imbalance is mitigated with the SMOTE technique. The performance of five different classifiers is evaluated and compared using accuracy, precision, recall, and F1 score. Results show that Random Forest achieves 98.32% accuracy, 89.12% precision, 92.29% recall, and 90.57% F1-score. Whereas the decision tree emerges as the 2nd best classifier. The obtained results highlight the efficacy of the proposed framework for automated ECG analysis in clinical diagnostics.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Published
2025-08-08
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1109/icbmesh66209.2025.11182179
Primary Topic
ECG Monitoring and Analysis
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Comparative Analysis of Machine Learning Algorithms for Arrhythmia Detection

Jeyashree Krishnan, Rohit Gupta, R Kesavapriya
ECG Monitoring and Analysis
article

Comparative Analysis of Machine Learning Algorithms for Arrhythmia Detection

Jeyashree Krishnan, Rohit Gupta, R Kesavapriya
article en

Abstract

The presented paper proposes a framework for arrhythmia classification ECG signal. The proposed framework is validated using the MIT-BIH Arrhythmia Database. The class imbalance is mitigated with the SMOTE technique. The performance of five different classifiers is evaluated and compared using accuracy, precision, recall, and F1 score. Results show that Random Forest achieves 98.32% accuracy, 89.12% precision, 92.29% recall, and 90.57% F1-score. Whereas the decision tree emerges as the 2nd best classifier. The obtained results highlight the efficacy of the proposed framework for automated ECG analysis in clinical diagnostics.

SRM Institute of Science and Technology (IN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 59%
ECG Monitoring and Analysis
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.