Comparison of Machine Learning Methods for ADHD Medical Imaging Diagnosis

ADHD is a chronic disorder that significantly affects patients’ occupational development, interpersonal relationships, and quality of life. In this study, based on the ADHD dataset and combining feature extraction with visualization analysis, we evaluated the classification performance of seven models: RF, XGB, SVM, LR, GNB, 3D_CNN and 3D_ResNet. Results of 10-fold cross-validation showed that 3D_ResNet and SVM achieved the highest accuracy, at 70% and 63% respectively. 3D_ResNet incurred more expensive computational costs, whereas SVM demonstrated particular advantage in reducing missed diagnoses to meet clinical requirements, recall is 87.67%. The RF, XGB, and GNB models exhibited balanced overall performance, while LR and 3D_CNN showed less stability. Through comparative analysis of these models, this study provides a reference for optimizing auxiliary diagnostic tools for ADHD.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Published
2025-06-06
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1109/ngdn66208.2025.11182153
Primary Topic
EEG and Brain-Computer Interfaces
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Comparison of Machine Learning Methods for ADHD Medical Imaging Diagnosis

Yu Xue
EEG and Brain-Computer Interfaces
article

Comparison of Machine Learning Methods for ADHD Medical Imaging Diagnosis

Yu Xue
article en

Abstract

ADHD is a chronic disorder that significantly affects patients’ occupational development, interpersonal relationships, and quality of life. In this study, based on the ADHD dataset and combining feature extraction with visualization analysis, we evaluated the classification performance of seven models: RF, XGB, SVM, LR, GNB, 3D_CNN and 3D_ResNet. Results of 10-fold cross-validation showed that 3D_ResNet and SVM achieved the highest accuracy, at 70% and 63% respectively. 3D_ResNet incurred more expensive computational costs, whereas SVM demonstrated particular advantage in reducing missed diagnoses to meet clinical requirements, recall is 87.67%. The RF, XGB, and GNB models exhibited balanced overall performance, while LR and 3D_CNN showed less stability. Through comparative analysis of these models, this study provides a reference for optimizing auxiliary diagnostic tools for ADHD.

Yunnan University of Finance And Economics (CN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 73%
EEG and Brain-Computer Interfaces
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.