The analytic hierarchy process as a cognitive tool for evaluating switch components

The purpose of this study is to improve the approach to the comprehensive evaluation of switch elements by applying the Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP). This method makes it possible to determine their priority according to safety and efficiency criteria, as well as to justify optimal strategies for modernization and reconstruction under conditions of increasing train speeds. The scientific approach involves the use of AHP with consideration of the specific operational features of switches on high-speed railways. In particular, the study accounts for higher safety and speed requirements, decreasing maintenance costs, and the reduced service life of structural components. A hierarchy of criteria was developed, along with pairwise comparisons, the calculation of weighting coefficients, and an integrated assessment of alternatives. The application of AHP enabled the determination of the priority of each switch type based on the criteria of traffic safety, speed, operational costs, and service life. According to the analysis, the priorities of the main switch elements were established as follows: frog – 0.395; closure curve – 0.234; switch blade – 0.190; switch curve – 0.181. These results confirm that the frog is the most critical element in terms of its overall impact on safety, speed, and maintenance costs, which is primarily due to its structural complexity and high wear rate (especially under dynamic loads). The findings provide a basis for informed decision-making regarding the prioritization of repair or replacement of individual structural elements, considering the operating conditions of high-speed lines.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Cognitive Sustainability
Published
2025-09-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.55343/cogsust.20523
Primary Topic
Multi-Criteria Decision Making
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The analytic hierarchy process as a cognitive tool for evaluating switch components

Dmytro Kurhan, M. B. Kurhan, Vladyslav Khmelevskyi, Serhii Baidak
Cognitive Sustainability
Multi-Criteria Decision Making
article

The analytic hierarchy process as a cognitive tool for evaluating switch components

Dmytro Kurhan, M. B. Kurhan, Vladyslav Khmelevskyi, Serhii Baidak
article en

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to improve the approach to the comprehensive evaluation of switch elements by applying the Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP). This method makes it possible to determine their priority according to safety and efficiency criteria, as well as to justify optimal strategies for modernization and reconstruction under conditions of increasing train speeds. The scientific approach involves the use of AHP with consideration of the specific operational features of switches on high-speed railways. In particular, the study accounts for higher safety and speed requirements, decreasing maintenance costs, and the reduced service life of structural components. A hierarchy of criteria was developed, along with pairwise comparisons, the calculation of weighting coefficients, and an integrated assessment of alternatives. The application of AHP enabled the determination of the priority of each switch type based on the criteria of traffic safety, speed, operational costs, and service life. According to the analysis, the priorities of the main switch elements were established as follows: frog – 0.395; closure curve – 0.234; switch blade – 0.190; switch curve – 0.181. These results confirm that the frog is the most critical element in terms of its overall impact on safety, speed, and maintenance costs, which is primarily due to its structural complexity and high wear rate (especially under dynamic loads). The findings provide a basis for informed decision-making regarding the prioritization of repair or replacement of individual structural elements, considering the operating conditions of high-speed lines.

Cognitive SustainabilityVol. 4(3)
Ukrainian State University of Chemical Technology (UA), Ukrainian State University of Railway Transport (UA)
Openalex Percentile: Top 68%
Multi-Criteria Decision Making
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

The analytic hierarchy process as a cognitive tool for evaluating switch components — Dmytro Kurhan, M. B. Kurhan, et al. · Cognitive Sustainability (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS