Understanding obstetrical soft markers: Significance and implications in 2025

Over the past two decades, prenatal screening options have advanced considerably. Ultrasound soft markers and serum screening have long served as the foundation for non-invasive aneuploidy risk assessment. The advent of cell-free DNA (cfDNA) testing has further enhanced the ability to screen for common aneuploidies, offering the most accurate single screening method for trisomies 21, 18, and 13. The Society of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists of Canada (SOGC) first published guidelines on soft markers in 2005, with subsequent updates in 2017 and 2024, reflecting ongoing changes in screening recommendations. Consequently, the role of ultrasound soft markers has shifted. Many isolated soft markers are no longer considered statistically significant. This article will review recent developments and their relevance to current sonographic practice, emphasizing the continued importance of soft markers in identifying chromosomal abnormalities.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
˜The œCanadian journal of medical sonography.
Published
2025-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3138/cjms-2025-0001
Primary Topic
Prenatal Screening and Diagnostics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Understanding obstetrical soft markers: Significance and implications in 2025

Susan Burnett-Roy
˜The œCanadian journal of medical sonography.
Prenatal Screening and Diagnostics
article

Understanding obstetrical soft markers: Significance and implications in 2025

Susan Burnett-Roy
article en

Abstract

Over the past two decades, prenatal screening options have advanced considerably. Ultrasound soft markers and serum screening have long served as the foundation for non-invasive aneuploidy risk assessment. The advent of cell-free DNA (cfDNA) testing has further enhanced the ability to screen for common aneuploidies, offering the most accurate single screening method for trisomies 21, 18, and 13. The Society of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists of Canada (SOGC) first published guidelines on soft markers in 2005, with subsequent updates in 2017 and 2024, reflecting ongoing changes in screening recommendations. Consequently, the role of ultrasound soft markers has shifted. Many isolated soft markers are no longer considered statistically significant. This article will review recent developments and their relevance to current sonographic practice, emphasizing the continued importance of soft markers in identifying chromosomal abnormalities.

˜The œCanadian journal of medical sonography.Vol. 16(4)
Center for Assessment (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 62%
Prenatal Screening and Diagnostics
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.