Approximation Does Not Help in Quantum Unitary Time-Reversal

Access to the time-reverse $U^{-1}$ of an unknown quantum unitary process $U$ is widely assumed in quantum learning, metrology, and many-body physics. The fundamental task of unitary time-reversal dictates implementing $U^{-1}$ to within diamond-norm error $ε$ using black-box queries to the $d$-dimensional unitary $U$. Although the query complexity of this task has been extensively studied, existing lower bounds either hold only for the exact case (i.e., $ε=0$) or are suboptimal in $d$. This raises a central question: does approximation help reduce the query complexity of unitary time-reversal? We settle this question in the negative by establishing a robust and tight lower bound $Ω((1-ε)d^2)$ with explicit dependence on the error $ε$. This implies that unitary time-reversal retains optimal exponential hardness (in the number of qubits) even when constant error is allowed. Our bound applies to adaptive and coherent algorithms with unbounded ancillas and holds even when $ε$ is an average-case distance error.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Published
2026-06-09
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1145/3798129.3800847
Primary Topic
Microwave Imaging and Scattering Analysis
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Approximation Does Not Help in Quantum Unitary Time-Reversal

Nengkun Yu, Zhicheng Zhang, Kean Chen
Microwave Imaging and Scattering Analysis
article

Approximation Does Not Help in Quantum Unitary Time-Reversal

Nengkun Yu, Zhicheng Zhang, Kean Chen
article en

Abstract

Access to the time-reverse $U^{-1}$ of an unknown quantum unitary process $U$ is widely assumed in quantum learning, metrology, and many-body physics. The fundamental task of unitary time-reversal dictates implementing $U^{-1}$ to within diamond-norm error $ε$ using black-box queries to the $d$-dimensional unitary $U$. Although the query complexity of this task has been extensively studied, existing lower bounds either hold only for the exact case (i.e., $ε=0$) or are suboptimal in $d$. This raises a central question: does approximation help reduce the query complexity of unitary time-reversal? We settle this question in the negative by establishing a robust and tight lower bound $Ω((1-ε)d^2)$ with explicit dependence on the error $ε$. This implies that unitary time-reversal retains optimal exponential hardness (in the number of qubits) even when constant error is allowed. Our bound applies to adaptive and coherent algorithms with unbounded ancillas and holds even when $ε$ is an average-case distance error.

University of Technology Sydney (AU), Stony Brook University (US), University of Pennsylvania (US), Philadelphia University (US)
Australian Research Council
Openalex Percentile: Top 100%
Microwave Imaging and Scattering Analysis
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Approximation Does Not Help in Quantum Unitary Time-Reversal — Nengkun Yu, Zhicheng Zhang, et al. · (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS