A comparison of head‐worn versus handheld artificial intelligence implementations for people with vision loss

We found no evidence to demonstrate an advantage in completing tasks using either head-worn (ARx and Meta glasses) or smartphone AI implementations.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Optometry and Vision Science
Published
2025-09-29
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1097/opx.0000000000002298
Primary Topic
Tactile and Sensory Interactions
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A comparison of head‐worn versus handheld artificial intelligence implementations for people with vision loss

Hilde P. A. van der Aa, Ruth M. A. van Nispen, William Seiple, Fernanda Garcia‐Piña et al.
Optometry and Vision Science
Tactile and Sensory Interactions
article

A comparison of head‐worn versus handheld artificial intelligence implementations for people with vision loss

Hilde P. A. van der Aa, Ruth M. A. van Nispen, William Seiple, Fernanda Garcia‐Piña, Izekiel Greco
article en

Abstract

We found no evidence to demonstrate an advantage in completing tasks using either head-worn (ARx and Meta glasses) or smartphone AI implementations.

Optometry and Vision ScienceVol. 102(10)
Lighthouse Guild (US), GGD Amsterdam (NL), Public Health Service of Amsterdam (NL), Amsterdam University Medical Centers (NL), New York University (US), Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam (NL)
Openalex Percentile: Top 73%
Tactile and Sensory Interactions
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.