The efficacy of modified bloodless del Nido cardioplegia in isolated aortic valve replacement

This study aimed to evaluate the safety and efficacy of a modified, bloodless Del Nido (DN) cardioplegia solution in patients undergoing isolated aortic valve replacement (AVR). A total of 370 patients who underwent isolated AVR between 2015 and 2022 were retrospectively analyzed. Patients were categorized into two groups based on the cardioplegia solution used: the bloodless DN group (N = 180) and the histidine-tryptophan-ketoglutarate (HTK) group (N = 190). To reduce selection bias and adjust for baseline differences, inverse probability of treatment weighting analysis was performed. There was no significant difference in in-hospital mortality between the two groups (HTK vs. DN: 1.2% vs. 0.9%, P = 0.554). However, the rate of spontaneous sinus rhythm restoration without the need for defibrillation following aortic cross-clamp release was significantly higher in the DN group (40.0% vs. 75.2%, P < 0.001). Additionally, the initial postoperative lactate level (3.0 ± 2.6 mmol/L vs. 2.2 ± 1.4 mmol/L, P = 0.002), and the incidence of low cardiac output syndrome (9.4% vs. 1.7%, P < 0.001) were significantly lower in the DN group compared to the HTK group. Other postoperative morbidities did not differ significantly between the groups. The modified bloodless Del Nido cardioplegia demonstrated favorable myocardial protection and early clinical outcomes compared to HTK solution in patients undergoing isolated AVR. These findings suggest that the bloodless Del Nido technique may be a viable alternative, although further validation in larger, prospective studies is warranted.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
PLoS ONE
Published
2025-09-29
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0333083
Primary Topic
Cardiac Ischemia and Reperfusion
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The efficacy of modified bloodless del Nido cardioplegia in isolated aortic valve replacement

Heemoon Lee, Bongyeon Sohn, Jae Suk Yoo, Dong Jin Kim
PLoS ONE
Cardiac Ischemia and Reperfusion
article

The efficacy of modified bloodless del Nido cardioplegia in isolated aortic valve replacement

Heemoon Lee, Bongyeon Sohn, Jae Suk Yoo, Dong Jin Kim
article en

Abstract

This study aimed to evaluate the safety and efficacy of a modified, bloodless Del Nido (DN) cardioplegia solution in patients undergoing isolated aortic valve replacement (AVR). A total of 370 patients who underwent isolated AVR between 2015 and 2022 were retrospectively analyzed. Patients were categorized into two groups based on the cardioplegia solution used: the bloodless DN group (N = 180) and the histidine-tryptophan-ketoglutarate (HTK) group (N = 190). To reduce selection bias and adjust for baseline differences, inverse probability of treatment weighting analysis was performed. There was no significant difference in in-hospital mortality between the two groups (HTK vs. DN: 1.2% vs. 0.9%, P = 0.554). However, the rate of spontaneous sinus rhythm restoration without the need for defibrillation following aortic cross-clamp release was significantly higher in the DN group (40.0% vs. 75.2%, P < 0.001). Additionally, the initial postoperative lactate level (3.0 ± 2.6 mmol/L vs. 2.2 ± 1.4 mmol/L, P = 0.002), and the incidence of low cardiac output syndrome (9.4% vs. 1.7%, P < 0.001) were significantly lower in the DN group compared to the HTK group. Other postoperative morbidities did not differ significantly between the groups. The modified bloodless Del Nido cardioplegia demonstrated favorable myocardial protection and early clinical outcomes compared to HTK solution in patients undergoing isolated AVR. These findings suggest that the bloodless Del Nido technique may be a viable alternative, although further validation in larger, prospective studies is warranted.

PLoS ONEVol. 20(9)
Asan Medical Center (KR), Sejong General Hospital (KR)
Openalex Percentile: Top 62%
Cardiac Ischemia and Reperfusion
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.