Usefulness and Limits of DOAC Removal Agents Based on Activated Charcoal in Thrombophilia Testing: Literature Review and Expert Proposals

Although inherited and acquired thrombophilia screening should ideally be performed outside of any direct oral anticoagulant (DOAC) therapy, it is sometimes performed in patients who are anticoagulated. However, DOACs have been shown to interfere with many hemostasis tests, with a risk of false-positive/negative results in lupus anticoagulant testing and overestimation of natural coagulation inhibitor levels, which may lead to misdiagnosis. Devices have been developed to overcome DOAC interference but their role in thrombophilia testing is not clearly established. In this comprehensive review, we provide an in-depth overview of the literature on the impact of DOACs on thrombophilia assays, including lupus anticoagulant testing, antithrombin, protein C, and protein S assessment. DOACs can interfere with the results of thrombophilia testing even at low concentrations; therefore information on current or recently discontinued anticoagulant treatment should be provided when prescribing thrombophilia testing. Data on the usefulness of the most used DOAC removal systems based on activated charcoal to circumvent DOAC interference are heterogeneous. They are summarized in this critical review. Although activated charcoal could be useful to remove DOACs from plasma prior to thrombophilia testing, it may not be completely effective, particularly with apixaban. Hence, and in the light of the available literature, we provide 22 practical proposals for reliable thrombophilia testing and accurate result interpretation in samples from patients receiving DOACs and treated in vitro with activated charcoal.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Thrombosis and Haemostasis
Published
2025-09-29
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1055/a-2695-2674
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Venous Thromboembolism Diagnosis and Management
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.87

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Usefulness and Limits of DOAC Removal Agents Based on Activated Charcoal in Thrombophilia Testing: Literature Review and Expert Proposals

Valérie Eschwège, Laëtitia Mauge, Georges Jourdi, Nicolas Gendron et al.
1 citations
Thrombosis and Haemostasis
Venous Thromboembolism Diagnosis and Management
1.87
article

Usefulness and Limits of DOAC Removal Agents Based on Activated Charcoal in Thrombophilia Testing: Literature Review and Expert Proposals

Valérie Eschwège, Laëtitia Mauge, Georges Jourdi, Nicolas Gendron, Claire Flaujac, Emmanuel de Maistre
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Although inherited and acquired thrombophilia screening should ideally be performed outside of any direct oral anticoagulant (DOAC) therapy, it is sometimes performed in patients who are anticoagulated. However, DOACs have been shown to interfere with many hemostasis tests, with a risk of false-positive/negative results in lupus anticoagulant testing and overestimation of natural coagulation inhibitor levels, which may lead to misdiagnosis. Devices have been developed to overcome DOAC interference but their role in thrombophilia testing is not clearly established. In this comprehensive review, we provide an in-depth overview of the literature on the impact of DOACs on thrombophilia assays, including lupus anticoagulant testing, antithrombin, protein C, and protein S assessment. DOACs can interfere with the results of thrombophilia testing even at low concentrations; therefore information on current or recently discontinued anticoagulant treatment should be provided when prescribing thrombophilia testing. Data on the usefulness of the most used DOAC removal systems based on activated charcoal to circumvent DOAC interference are heterogeneous. They are summarized in this critical review. Although activated charcoal could be useful to remove DOACs from plasma prior to thrombophilia testing, it may not be completely effective, particularly with apixaban. Hence, and in the light of the available literature, we provide 22 practical proposals for reliable thrombophilia testing and accurate result interpretation in samples from patients receiving DOACs and treated in vitro with activated charcoal.

Thrombosis and Haemostasis
Saint-Gobain (France) (FR), Inserm (FR), Université de Bourgogne (FR), Université Paris Cité (FR), Sorbonne Paris Cité (FR), Assistance Publique – Hôpitaux de Paris (FR), Centre Hospitalier Régional et Universitaire de Nancy (FR), Hôpital Européen Georges-Pompidou (FR), Hôpital Européen (FR), CHU Dijon Bourgogne (FR), Hôpital Lariboisière (FR), Hôpital André Mignot (FR), Paris Cardiovascular Research Center (FR), Centre Hospitalier de Versailles (FR)
Bristol-Myers Squibb, Pfizer
Openalex Percentile: Top 12%
Venous Thromboembolism Diagnosis and Management
1.87
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.