ETHICS OF ROBOTS

This paper explores a multidimensional framework rooted in two foundational dichotomies: the distinction between potential infinity and actual infinity, and the organizational structure of scientific theories—either as deductive systems from axioms or as problem-oriented approaches. These dichotomies serve as a theoretical lens through which various domains—science, ethics, biology, and technology—are analyzed. Beginning with a critique of modern set theory and its reliance on actual infinity, the work contrasts it with the constructivist stance grounded in potential infinity, arguing that each implies different epistemological commitments and logical structures, particularly regarding undecidability and the law of double negation.The paper culminates in a critical reflection on the ethics of human-robot interaction.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Humanology international Journal for Advanced and Applied Philosophy for 21st Centur
Published
2025-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.46793/humanologyi-1.075d
Primary Topic
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

ETHICS OF ROBOTS

Antonino Drago
Humanology international Journal for Advanced and Applied Philosophy for 21st Centur
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
article

ETHICS OF ROBOTS

Antonino Drago
article en

Abstract

This paper explores a multidimensional framework rooted in two foundational dichotomies: the distinction between potential infinity and actual infinity, and the organizational structure of scientific theories—either as deductive systems from axioms or as problem-oriented approaches. These dichotomies serve as a theoretical lens through which various domains—science, ethics, biology, and technology—are analyzed. Beginning with a critique of modern set theory and its reliance on actual infinity, the work contrasts it with the constructivist stance grounded in potential infinity, arguing that each implies different epistemological commitments and logical structures, particularly regarding undecidability and the law of double negation.The paper culminates in a critical reflection on the ethics of human-robot interaction.

Humanology international Journal for Advanced and Applied Philosophy for 21st CenturVol. I(1)
Openalex Percentile: Top 73%
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.