The Roman Democracy of Fergus Millar

In his The Roman Republic in Political Thought (his Jerusalem Lectures in History, delivered in memory of Menahem Stern), Millar refers to the reforms implemented in 1980s by Thatcher’s government as the historical context in which he first conceived his work on the Roman Republic. However, the political climate of that era, this paper shows, did not merely serve as the context in which Millar thought about the Republican political system. Rather, it functioned, I argue, as a foil within his historical analysis and constituted one of the domains he aimed to intervene in through his historical research. His reading of Roman Republican politics and of its interpretations in later political thought was intrinsically informed by his opposition to (in particular) the university policies of the 1980s and 1990s and to the neo-liberal discourse that informed them.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
REVISTA DE HISTORIOGRAFÍA (RevHisto)
Published
2025-09-04
DOI
https://doi.org/10.20318/revhisto.2025.9722
Primary Topic
Political Theory and Influence
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The Roman Democracy of Fergus Millar

Valentina Arena
REVISTA DE HISTORIOGRAFÍA (RevHisto)
Political Theory and Influence
article

The Roman Democracy of Fergus Millar

Valentina Arena
article en

Abstract

In his The Roman Republic in Political Thought (his Jerusalem Lectures in History, delivered in memory of Menahem Stern), Millar refers to the reforms implemented in 1980s by Thatcher’s government as the historical context in which he first conceived his work on the Roman Republic. However, the political climate of that era, this paper shows, did not merely serve as the context in which Millar thought about the Republican political system. Rather, it functioned, I argue, as a foil within his historical analysis and constituted one of the domains he aimed to intervene in through his historical research. His reading of Roman Republican politics and of its interpretations in later political thought was intrinsically informed by his opposition to (in particular) the university policies of the 1980s and 1990s and to the neo-liberal discourse that informed them.

REVISTA DE HISTORIOGRAFÍA (RevHisto)(40)
University of Oxford (GB)
Princeton University, Johns Hopkins University, Royal Anthropological Institute, University of Cambridge, University of Oxford
Openalex Percentile: Top 69%
Political Theory and Influence
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.