Notes on the Relationship between Literature and Philosophy

Abstract: Literature and philosophy evoke a simultaneous proximity of topic domains alongside a divergence in the approaches and methods with which they relate to them. While acknowledging both, this article explores the potential for collaborative interconnection and a possible alliance between otherwise differing fields. It traces the processes of Hegel’s dialectics and Foucault’s transgression, then brings them together with de Beauvoir’s notion of transcendence, to merge affirmation with negation and transformation. Together, the three concepts allow for a reading that addresses the multitude of all in a way that also encompasses its negation but ultimately enables reinvention. By engaging with differences, otherness, and limits in this productive and reconstructive manner, literature and philosophy can reveal the dynamic and creative reemergence of their content, themselves, and each other, and assist in further reimagining other orders of thought.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
The Yearbook of English Studies
Published
2025-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1353/yes.00016
Primary Topic
Classical Philosophy and Thought
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Notes on the Relationship between Literature and Philosophy

Polona Osojnik
The Yearbook of English Studies
Classical Philosophy and Thought
article

Notes on the Relationship between Literature and Philosophy

Polona Osojnik
article en

Abstract

Abstract: Literature and philosophy evoke a simultaneous proximity of topic domains alongside a divergence in the approaches and methods with which they relate to them. While acknowledging both, this article explores the potential for collaborative interconnection and a possible alliance between otherwise differing fields. It traces the processes of Hegel’s dialectics and Foucault’s transgression, then brings them together with de Beauvoir’s notion of transcendence, to merge affirmation with negation and transformation. Together, the three concepts allow for a reading that addresses the multitude of all in a way that also encompasses its negation but ultimately enables reinvention. By engaging with differences, otherness, and limits in this productive and reconstructive manner, literature and philosophy can reveal the dynamic and creative reemergence of their content, themselves, and each other, and assist in further reimagining other orders of thought.

The Yearbook of English StudiesVol. 55(1)
Openalex Percentile: Top 74%
Classical Philosophy and Thought
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.