Global Literary Studies: An Institutionalized Field?

Abstract: This article examines the emergence of global literary studies as a developing field in response to growing academic interest in transnational literary circulation, cultural transfer, and interdisciplinary, decolonial methodologies. It proposes a conceptual framework based on five key notions — space, scale, time, connectivity, and agency — to guide research across literature, translation, and film. By tracing the historical trajectories of related terms and traditions such as world literature, cultural transfer, and transnational history, the article critiques Eurocentric and binary models and advocates for more inclusive, plural, and dynamic understandings of literary systems. Emphasizing the relevance of interdisciplinary approaches, digital humanities, and data-driven methods, it also calls for institutional decentralization to foreground global and non-Western perspectives.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
The Yearbook of English Studies
Published
2025-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1353/yes.00021
Primary Topic
Postcolonial and Cultural Literary Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Global Literary Studies: An Institutionalized Field?

Neus Rotger, Diana Roig-Sanz
The Yearbook of English Studies
Postcolonial and Cultural Literary Studies
article

Global Literary Studies: An Institutionalized Field?

Neus Rotger, Diana Roig-Sanz
article en

Abstract

Abstract: This article examines the emergence of global literary studies as a developing field in response to growing academic interest in transnational literary circulation, cultural transfer, and interdisciplinary, decolonial methodologies. It proposes a conceptual framework based on five key notions — space, scale, time, connectivity, and agency — to guide research across literature, translation, and film. By tracing the historical trajectories of related terms and traditions such as world literature, cultural transfer, and transnational history, the article critiques Eurocentric and binary models and advocates for more inclusive, plural, and dynamic understandings of literary systems. Emphasizing the relevance of interdisciplinary approaches, digital humanities, and data-driven methods, it also calls for institutional decentralization to foreground global and non-Western perspectives.

The Yearbook of English StudiesVol. 55(1)
Openalex Percentile: Top 73%
Postcolonial and Cultural Literary Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.