Model-Free Adaptive Control for Three-Dimensional Crane Systems

This paper proposes the development of and validation of a Model-Free Adaptive Control (MFAC) algorithm for a three-dimensional crane system in a multi input-multi output setting. The three-dimensional cranes are complex systems with various nonlinearities providing a robust environment for testing the adaptability and efficiency of the MFAC algorithms. The paper aims to compare two distinct versions of the algorithm, i.e., the compact form dynamic linearization (CFDL) and the partial form dynamic linearization (PFDL). Both versions are analyzed in terms of their performance in controlling the three-dimensional crane’s movement by controlling the x, y, and z-axes under varying conditions. Experimental validation highlights the strengths and limitations of CFDL and PFDL versions, offering insights into their practical applications and theoretical underpinnings.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
IFAC-PapersOnLine
Published
2025-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ifacol.2025.09.540
Primary Topic
Iterative Learning Control Systems
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Model-Free Adaptive Control for Three-Dimensional Crane Systems

Radu‐Emil Precup, Emil M. PETRIU, Raul‐Cristian Roman, Elena-Lorena Hedrea
IFAC-PapersOnLine
Iterative Learning Control Systems
article

Model-Free Adaptive Control for Three-Dimensional Crane Systems

Radu‐Emil Precup, Emil M. PETRIU, Raul‐Cristian Roman, Elena-Lorena Hedrea
article en

Abstract

This paper proposes the development of and validation of a Model-Free Adaptive Control (MFAC) algorithm for a three-dimensional crane system in a multi input-multi output setting. The three-dimensional cranes are complex systems with various nonlinearities providing a robust environment for testing the adaptability and efficiency of the MFAC algorithms. The paper aims to compare two distinct versions of the algorithm, i.e., the compact form dynamic linearization (CFDL) and the partial form dynamic linearization (PFDL). Both versions are analyzed in terms of their performance in controlling the three-dimensional crane’s movement by controlling the x, y, and z-axes under varying conditions. Experimental validation highlights the strengths and limitations of CFDL and PFDL versions, offering insights into their practical applications and theoretical underpinnings.

IFAC-PapersOnLineVol. 59(11)
University of Ottawa (CA), Polytechnic University of Timişoara (RO), Romanian Academy (RO)
Openalex Percentile: Top 66%
Iterative Learning Control Systems
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Model-Free Adaptive Control for Three-Dimensional Crane Systems — Radu‐Emil Precup, Emil M. PETRIU, et al. · IFAC-PapersOnLine (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS