Reconsidering the Utility of Race-Specific Lung Function Prediction Equations.
<strong>Rationale:</strong> African American individuals have worse outcomes in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). <strong>Objectives:</strong> To assess whether race-specific approaches for estimating lung function contribute to racial inequities by failing to recognize pathological decrements and considering them normal. <strong>Methods:</strong> In a cohort with and at risk for COPD, we assessed whether lung function prediction equations applied in a race-specific versus universal manner better modeled the relationship between FEV<sub>1</sub>, FVC, and other COPD outcomes, including the COPD Assessment Test, St. George's Respiratory Questionnaire, computed tomography percent emphysema, airway wall thickness, and 6-minute-walk test. We related these outcomes to differences in FEV<sub>1</sub> using multiple linear regression and compared predictive performance between fitted models using root mean squared error and Alpaydin's paired <em>F</em> test. <strong>Measurements and Main Results:</strong> Using race-specific equations, African American individuals were calculated to have better lung function than non-Hispanic White individuals (FEV<sub>1</sub>, 76.8% vs. 71.8% predicted; <em>P</em> = 0.02). Using universally applied equations, African American individuals were calculated to have worse lung function. Using Hankinson's Non-Hispanic White equation, FEV<sub>1</sub> was 64.7% versus 71.8% (<em>P</em> < 0.001). Using the Global Lung Initiative's Other race equation, FEV<sub>1</sub> was 70.0% versus 77.9% (<em>P</em> < 0.001). Prediction errors from linear regression were less for universally applied equations compared with race-specific equations when examining FEV<sub>1</sub>% predicted with the COPD Assessment Test (<em>P</em> < 0.01), St. George's Respiratory Questionnaire (<em>P</em> < 0.01), and airway wall thickness (<em>P</em> < 0.01). Although African American participants had greater adversity (<em>P</em> < 0.001), less adversity was only associated with better FEV<sub>1</sub> in non-Hispanic White participants (<em>P</em> for interaction = 0.041). <strong>Conclusions:</strong> Race-specific equations may underestimate COPD severity in African American individuals.Clinical trial registered with www.clinicaltrials.gov (NCT01969344).
Authors
- Trisha M. Parekh (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2930-8960)
- Jamuna K. Krishnan (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1460-5276)
- Gerard J. Criner (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1267-3483)
- Eric A. Hoffman (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8456-9437)
- Russell Paul Bowler (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4651-363X)
- Igor Barjaktarević (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8096-0858)
- Chinedu Ejike (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7204-4948)
- R. Graham Barr
- Aaron Baugh (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9527-691X)
- Victor E. Ortega (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3962-0528)
- Mark T. Dransfield (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9207-1820)
- Stephen P. Peters (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4176-7999)
- Jeffrey L. Curtis (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5191-4847)
- Nirupama Putcha (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0688-1836)
- Prescott G. Woodruff (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3176-0603)
- Nadia N. Hansel
- Jerry A. Krishnan (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5525-4778)
- Alejandro P. Comellas (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1521-7520)
- Stephen I. Rennard (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7909-0253)
- David M. Mannino (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3646-7828)
- Neeta Thakur (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6126-6601)
- David Couper (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4313-9235)
- Robert Paine
- MeiLan K. Han
- Christopher B. Cooper
- Stephen Shiboski
Institutions
- University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill (US)
Publication Details
- Journal
- UNC Libraries
- Published
- 2025-04-26
- DOI
- https://doi.org/10.17615/xbr5-m095
- Primary Topic
- Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) Research
- Type
- article
- Field-Weighted Citation Impact
- 0.00