Reconsidering the Utility of Race-Specific Lung Function Prediction Equations.

<strong>Rationale:</strong> African American individuals have worse outcomes in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). <strong>Objectives:</strong> To assess whether race-specific approaches for estimating lung function contribute to racial inequities by failing to recognize pathological decrements and considering them normal. <strong>Methods:</strong> In a cohort with and at risk for COPD, we assessed whether lung function prediction equations applied in a race-specific versus universal manner better modeled the relationship between FEV<sub>1</sub>, FVC, and other COPD outcomes, including the COPD Assessment Test, St. George's Respiratory Questionnaire, computed tomography percent emphysema, airway wall thickness, and 6-minute-walk test. We related these outcomes to differences in FEV<sub>1</sub> using multiple linear regression and compared predictive performance between fitted models using root mean squared error and Alpaydin's paired <em>F</em> test. <strong>Measurements and Main Results:</strong> Using race-specific equations, African American individuals were calculated to have better lung function than non-Hispanic White individuals (FEV<sub>1</sub>, 76.8% vs. 71.8% predicted; <em>P</em>&thinsp;=&thinsp;0.02). Using universally applied equations, African American individuals were calculated to have worse lung function. Using Hankinson's Non-Hispanic White equation, FEV<sub>1</sub> was 64.7% versus 71.8% (<em>P</em>&thinsp;&lt;&thinsp;0.001). Using the Global Lung Initiative's Other race equation, FEV<sub>1</sub> was 70.0% versus 77.9% (<em>P</em>&thinsp;&lt;&thinsp;0.001). Prediction errors from linear regression were less for universally applied equations compared with race-specific equations when examining FEV<sub>1</sub>% predicted with the COPD Assessment Test (<em>P</em>&thinsp;&lt;&thinsp;0.01), St. George's Respiratory Questionnaire (<em>P</em>&thinsp;&lt;&thinsp;0.01), and airway wall thickness (<em>P</em>&thinsp;&lt;&thinsp;0.01). Although African American participants had greater adversity (<em>P</em>&thinsp;&lt;&thinsp;0.001), less adversity was only associated with better FEV<sub>1</sub> in non-Hispanic White participants (<em>P</em> for interaction&thinsp;=&thinsp;0.041). <strong>Conclusions:</strong> Race-specific equations may underestimate COPD severity in African American individuals.Clinical trial registered with www.clinicaltrials.gov (NCT01969344).

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
UNC Libraries
Published
2025-04-26
DOI
https://doi.org/10.17615/xbr5-m095
Primary Topic
Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Reconsidering the Utility of Race-Specific Lung Function Prediction Equations.

Trisha M. Parekh, Jamuna K. Krishnan, Gerard J. Criner, Eric A. Hoffman et al.
UNC Libraries
Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) Research
article

Reconsidering the Utility of Race-Specific Lung Function Prediction Equations.

Trisha M. Parekh, Jamuna K. Krishnan, Gerard J. Criner, Eric A. Hoffman, Russell Paul Bowler, Igor Barjaktarević, Chinedu Ejike, R. Graham Barr, Aaron Baugh, Victor E. Ortega, Mark T. Dransfield, Stephen P. Peters, Jeffrey L. Curtis, Nirupama Putcha, Prescott G. Woodruff, Nadia N. Hansel, Jerry A. Krishnan, Alejandro P. Comellas, Stephen I. Rennard, David M. Mannino, Neeta Thakur, David Couper, Robert Paine, MeiLan K. Han, Christopher B. Cooper, Stephen Shiboski
article en

Abstract

<strong>Rationale:</strong> African American individuals have worse outcomes in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). <strong>Objectives:</strong> To assess whether race-specific approaches for estimating lung function contribute to racial inequities by failing to recognize pathological decrements and considering them normal. <strong>Methods:</strong> In a cohort with and at risk for COPD, we assessed whether lung function prediction equations applied in a race-specific versus universal manner better modeled the relationship between FEV<sub>1</sub>, FVC, and other COPD outcomes, including the COPD Assessment Test, St. George's Respiratory Questionnaire, computed tomography percent emphysema, airway wall thickness, and 6-minute-walk test. We related these outcomes to differences in FEV<sub>1</sub> using multiple linear regression and compared predictive performance between fitted models using root mean squared error and Alpaydin's paired <em>F</em> test. <strong>Measurements and Main Results:</strong> Using race-specific equations, African American individuals were calculated to have better lung function than non-Hispanic White individuals (FEV<sub>1</sub>, 76.8% vs. 71.8% predicted; <em>P</em>&thinsp;=&thinsp;0.02). Using universally applied equations, African American individuals were calculated to have worse lung function. Using Hankinson's Non-Hispanic White equation, FEV<sub>1</sub> was 64.7% versus 71.8% (<em>P</em>&thinsp;&lt;&thinsp;0.001). Using the Global Lung Initiative's Other race equation, FEV<sub>1</sub> was 70.0% versus 77.9% (<em>P</em>&thinsp;&lt;&thinsp;0.001). Prediction errors from linear regression were less for universally applied equations compared with race-specific equations when examining FEV<sub>1</sub>% predicted with the COPD Assessment Test (<em>P</em>&thinsp;&lt;&thinsp;0.01), St. George's Respiratory Questionnaire (<em>P</em>&thinsp;&lt;&thinsp;0.01), and airway wall thickness (<em>P</em>&thinsp;&lt;&thinsp;0.01). Although African American participants had greater adversity (<em>P</em>&thinsp;&lt;&thinsp;0.001), less adversity was only associated with better FEV<sub>1</sub> in non-Hispanic White participants (<em>P</em> for interaction&thinsp;=&thinsp;0.041). <strong>Conclusions:</strong> Race-specific equations may underestimate COPD severity in African American individuals.Clinical trial registered with www.clinicaltrials.gov (NCT01969344).

UNC Libraries
University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 61%
Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) Research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.