A note on the strategic vulnerability of the Boston mechanism in random markets

Abstract We provide the first asymptotic analysis of the Boston Mechanism under equilibrium play in random markets. We provide two results. First, while 63% of students receive their first preference under truthful reporting–outperforming any other known mechanism in the literature–this rate converges to zero in any Nash equilibrium of the corresponding preference revelation game as the market size grows. Second, we show there exists a Nash equilibrium where the average student receives a dramatically inferior assignment: in markets with 1,000 students, the average placement shifts from the 7th choice (under truthfulness) to the 145th choice, representing a change from logarithmic to nearly linear average rank.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Social Choice and Welfare
Published
2026-03-05
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00355-026-01655-9
Primary Topic
Economic theories and models
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A note on the strategic vulnerability of the Boston mechanism in random markets

Josué Ortega
Social Choice and Welfare
Economic theories and models
article

A note on the strategic vulnerability of the Boston mechanism in random markets

Josué Ortega
article en

Abstract

Abstract We provide the first asymptotic analysis of the Boston Mechanism under equilibrium play in random markets. We provide two results. First, while 63% of students receive their first preference under truthful reporting–outperforming any other known mechanism in the literature–this rate converges to zero in any Nash equilibrium of the corresponding preference revelation game as the market size grows. Second, we show there exists a Nash equilibrium where the average student receives a dramatically inferior assignment: in markets with 1,000 students, the average placement shifts from the 7th choice (under truthfulness) to the 145th choice, representing a change from logarithmic to nearly linear average rank.

Social Choice and Welfare
Queen's University Belfast (GB)
Openalex Percentile: Top 100%
Economic theories and models
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.