Managerial Practice and Diversity Climate: The Roles of Workplace Voice, Centralization, and Teamwork

Diversity climate—shared employee perceptions of the extent to which an organization is inclusive and fair—is of increasing interest to public administration scholars . While research has linked diversity climate to a range of employee and organizational outcomes , less is known about how common managerial practices affect diversity climate . This article addresses this gap by examining three such practices: workplace voice , centralized decision‐making , and teamwork . Each is theoretically expected to act upon both the inclusion and fairness dimensions of diversity climate . We test these expectations using regression analysis of departmental‐level data collected through surveys of four North Carolina public organizations . The results suggest that workplace voice and teamwork enhance diversity climate , while centralized decision‐making diminishes it in workplaces with mostly white employees . Practically speaking , the results imply that common management techniques that benefit public organizations also foster positive diversity climates . Evidence for Practice Employee perceptions of the extent to which an organization is fair and inclusive, known as diversity climate, have been linked to a range of important organizational outcomes. Common managerial practices that produce organizational benefits also appear to strengthen diversity climate, specifically workplace voice, decentralized decision‐making, and teamwork. Public managers wishing to improve diversity climate should consider giving employees meaningful voice in workplace decisions, pushing decisions downward, and fostering teamwork.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
UNC Libraries
Published
2025-05-06
DOI
https://doi.org/10.17615/vhm1-rc84
Primary Topic
Gender Diversity and Inequality
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Managerial Practice and Diversity Climate: The Roles of Workplace Voice, Centralization, and Teamwork

Zhongnan Jiang, Erin L. Borry, Leisha DeHart‐Davis
UNC Libraries
Gender Diversity and Inequality
article

Managerial Practice and Diversity Climate: The Roles of Workplace Voice, Centralization, and Teamwork

Zhongnan Jiang, Erin L. Borry, Leisha DeHart‐Davis
article en

Abstract

Diversity climate—shared employee perceptions of the extent to which an organization is inclusive and fair—is of increasing interest to public administration scholars . While research has linked diversity climate to a range of employee and organizational outcomes , less is known about how common managerial practices affect diversity climate . This article addresses this gap by examining three such practices: workplace voice , centralized decision‐making , and teamwork . Each is theoretically expected to act upon both the inclusion and fairness dimensions of diversity climate . We test these expectations using regression analysis of departmental‐level data collected through surveys of four North Carolina public organizations . The results suggest that workplace voice and teamwork enhance diversity climate , while centralized decision‐making diminishes it in workplaces with mostly white employees . Practically speaking , the results imply that common management techniques that benefit public organizations also foster positive diversity climates . Evidence for Practice Employee perceptions of the extent to which an organization is fair and inclusive, known as diversity climate, have been linked to a range of important organizational outcomes. Common managerial practices that produce organizational benefits also appear to strengthen diversity climate, specifically workplace voice, decentralized decision‐making, and teamwork. Public managers wishing to improve diversity climate should consider giving employees meaningful voice in workplace decisions, pushing decisions downward, and fostering teamwork.

UNC Libraries
University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 67%
Gender Diversity and Inequality
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.