Gender Differences in Brainwave and Emotional Responses to Lightness and Chroma Variations of Purple Eyeshadow

Purpose: This study aimed to inform cosmetic color planning strategies by examining gender differences in brainwave activity and emotional evaluations elicited by purple eyeshadow stimuli that systematically vary in lightness and chroma.Methods: A total of 60 adult participants (30 males, 30 females) viewed purple eyeshadow sets across two variation series. Their brainwave responses were assessed using the coefficient of variation for brainwave power relative to their baseline EEG, while their emotional responses were measured using an average preference index (API) derived from semantic differential scales. Data were subjected to repeated-measures analysis of variance.Results: Low-lightness stimuli significantly increased β, γ, SEF50, and SEF90 whereas high-lightness stimuli enhanced α activity, suggesting relaxation. High-chroma conditions elicited stronger β, γ, SEF50, and SEF90 responses with less reduction in α activity compared with low-chroma stimuli. Hence, dark, saturated colors were associated with arousal and attentional activation, while lighter, less saturated tones promoted relaxation. Based on API results, positive evaluations were observed at intermediate lightness levels (6 and 8), with gender-specific differences in emotional responses despite generally consistent brainwave patterns.Conclusion: Physiological and psychological responses to cosmetic colors are more strongly influenced by lightness adjustments than by chroma. Thus, effective cosmetic color planning should prioritize lightness modulation while incorporating gender-specific preferences.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Asian Journal of Beauty and Cosmetology
Published
2025-08-29
DOI
https://doi.org/10.20402/ajbc.2025.0076
Primary Topic
melanin and skin pigmentation
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Gender Differences in Brainwave and Emotional Responses to Lightness and Chroma Variations of Purple Eyeshadow

Minkyung Kim
Asian Journal of Beauty and Cosmetology
melanin and skin pigmentation
article

Gender Differences in Brainwave and Emotional Responses to Lightness and Chroma Variations of Purple Eyeshadow

Minkyung Kim
article en

Abstract

Purpose: This study aimed to inform cosmetic color planning strategies by examining gender differences in brainwave activity and emotional evaluations elicited by purple eyeshadow stimuli that systematically vary in lightness and chroma.Methods: A total of 60 adult participants (30 males, 30 females) viewed purple eyeshadow sets across two variation series. Their brainwave responses were assessed using the coefficient of variation for brainwave power relative to their baseline EEG, while their emotional responses were measured using an average preference index (API) derived from semantic differential scales. Data were subjected to repeated-measures analysis of variance.Results: Low-lightness stimuli significantly increased β, γ, SEF50, and SEF90 whereas high-lightness stimuli enhanced α activity, suggesting relaxation. High-chroma conditions elicited stronger β, γ, SEF50, and SEF90 responses with less reduction in α activity compared with low-chroma stimuli. Hence, dark, saturated colors were associated with arousal and attentional activation, while lighter, less saturated tones promoted relaxation. Based on API results, positive evaluations were observed at intermediate lightness levels (6 and 8), with gender-specific differences in emotional responses despite generally consistent brainwave patterns.Conclusion: Physiological and psychological responses to cosmetic colors are more strongly influenced by lightness adjustments than by chroma. Thus, effective cosmetic color planning should prioritize lightness modulation while incorporating gender-specific preferences.

Asian Journal of Beauty and CosmetologyVol. 23(3)
Openalex Percentile: Top 71%
melanin and skin pigmentation
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.