The Effect of Student–Tutor Ratios: Experimental Evidence From a Pilot Online Math Tutoring Program

Budget constraints and limited tutor supply have caused many K–12 school districts to pivot from individual tutoring toward small-group tutoring to expand access to personalized instruction. We conduct a pilot experiment to contrast the effects of student–tutor ratios on middle school students’ math achievement and growth during an online tutoring program. We leverage a novel feature of the program where tutors often taught individual and small-group tutoring sessions, allowing them to directly compare their experiences across these settings. Both experimental estimates and tutor survey responses provide suggestive evidence that 1:1 tutoring is more effective than 3:1 tutoring in an online setting. Tutoring small groups online presents additional challenges for personalizing instruction, developing relationships, fostering participation, and managing student behavior.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis
Published
2025-09-29
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3102/01623737251364573
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Intelligent Tutoring Systems and Adaptive Learning
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
4.96
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The Effect of Student–Tutor Ratios: Experimental Evidence From a Pilot Online Math Tutoring Program

Virginia S. Lovison, Matthew A. Kraft
2 citations
Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis
Intelligent Tutoring Systems and Adaptive Learning
4.96
article

The Effect of Student–Tutor Ratios: Experimental Evidence From a Pilot Online Math Tutoring Program

Virginia S. Lovison, Matthew A. Kraft
article en
2 citations

Abstract

Budget constraints and limited tutor supply have caused many K–12 school districts to pivot from individual tutoring toward small-group tutoring to expand access to personalized instruction. We conduct a pilot experiment to contrast the effects of student–tutor ratios on middle school students’ math achievement and growth during an online tutoring program. We leverage a novel feature of the program where tutors often taught individual and small-group tutoring sessions, allowing them to directly compare their experiences across these settings. Both experimental estimates and tutor survey responses provide suggestive evidence that 1:1 tutoring is more effective than 3:1 tutoring in an online setting. Tutoring small groups online presents additional challenges for personalizing instruction, developing relationships, fostering participation, and managing student behavior.

Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis
John Brown University (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 5%
Intelligent Tutoring Systems and Adaptive Learning
4.96
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

The Effect of Student–Tutor Ratios: Experimental Evidence From a Pilot Online Math Tutoring Program — Virginia S. Lovison, Matthew A. Kraft · Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS