The Postmodern Paradox: Reconstructing China’s National Identity

This paper confronts an extraordinary contradiction: With an ideology built on historical continuity and collectivism, the world’s most populous authoritarian state now finds itself enmeshed in the contradictions of postmodern identity politics. With its gleeful pulverizing of truth, identity, and coherence, postmodernism has inadvertently infiltrated the narrative-driven fortress of the People’s Republic of China. In its national narrative, however, postmodernism erodes “Chineseness” from within. I explore how this paradox stretches across cultural, political, and diplomatic spheres, complicating China’s global image and muddling its efforts to project ideological coherence on the world stage.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Issues & Studies
Published
2025-09-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1142/s1013251125500134
Primary Topic
Chinese history and philosophy
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The Postmodern Paradox: Reconstructing China’s National Identity

Mary E. Gallagher
Issues & Studies
Chinese history and philosophy
article

The Postmodern Paradox: Reconstructing China’s National Identity

Mary E. Gallagher
article en

Abstract

This paper confronts an extraordinary contradiction: With an ideology built on historical continuity and collectivism, the world’s most populous authoritarian state now finds itself enmeshed in the contradictions of postmodern identity politics. With its gleeful pulverizing of truth, identity, and coherence, postmodernism has inadvertently infiltrated the narrative-driven fortress of the People’s Republic of China. In its national narrative, however, postmodernism erodes “Chineseness” from within. I explore how this paradox stretches across cultural, political, and diplomatic spheres, complicating China’s global image and muddling its efforts to project ideological coherence on the world stage.

Issues & StudiesVol. 61(04)
Openalex Percentile: Top 64%
Chinese history and philosophy
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.