Control Strategy for Voltage Disturbance Compensation and Power Factor Correction With On‐Site Short‐Circuit Level Calculation Using Grid‐Following Inverter

ABSTRACT The occurrence of voltage variations caused by the input/output of large loads and/or transmission lines, as well as faults and high levels of photovoltaic‐based distributed energy resource (DER) penetration, impairs power quality indicators at the power grid and causes financial losses for industrial consumers. In industrial electrical systems, knowing the short‐circuit level (SCL) at the point of common coupling (PCC), the relationship between the SCL and the desired reactive power can be used to define the capability of an existing inverter‐based DER for voltage compensation under conditions of SAG or SWELL. In this context, this article presents a proposal of ‘control strategy for voltage disturbance compensation and power factor correction with on‐site short circuit level calculation’ (CS‐VDCPFC‐SCLC) using grid‐following inverter. The main contribution is the identification of the situations in which an ordinary grid‐following (GFL) photovoltaic (PV) Inverter can or cannot be used for voltage compensation at the PCC, avoiding the use of the PV system to provide reactive power in cases where voltage compensation will not be possible. If the voltage at the PCC cannot be compensated, the CS‐VDCPFC‐SCLC can inject or absorb the exact amount of reactive power demanded by the local load to adjust the power factor, hence, avoiding the use of capacitor banks, synchronous compensators, thyristor reactors and/or static compensators (STATCOM). In order to validate the proposed control technique with an advanced method for the design of power electronics components, a controller hardware‐in‐the‐loop (C‐HIL) setup is employed. Results are provided and demonstrate the effectiveness and feasibility of the proposed solution. A 3.0 kW laboratory prototype was also built and analysed.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
IET Power Electronics
Published
2025-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1049/pel2.70123
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Microgrid Control and Optimization
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.21

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Control Strategy for Voltage Disturbance Compensation and Power Factor Correction With On‐Site Short‐Circuit Level Calculation Using Grid‐Following Inverter

Danillo B. Rodrigues, L.C. de Freitas, Lucas Pires, Matheus Soares et al.
1 citations
IET Power Electronics
Microgrid Control and Optimization
1.21
article

Control Strategy for Voltage Disturbance Compensation and Power Factor Correction With On‐Site Short‐Circuit Level Calculation Using Grid‐Following Inverter

Danillo B. Rodrigues, L.C. de Freitas, Lucas Pires, Matheus Soares, Érico C. Guimarães
article en
1 citations

Abstract

ABSTRACT The occurrence of voltage variations caused by the input/output of large loads and/or transmission lines, as well as faults and high levels of photovoltaic‐based distributed energy resource (DER) penetration, impairs power quality indicators at the power grid and causes financial losses for industrial consumers. In industrial electrical systems, knowing the short‐circuit level (SCL) at the point of common coupling (PCC), the relationship between the SCL and the desired reactive power can be used to define the capability of an existing inverter‐based DER for voltage compensation under conditions of SAG or SWELL. In this context, this article presents a proposal of ‘control strategy for voltage disturbance compensation and power factor correction with on‐site short circuit level calculation’ (CS‐VDCPFC‐SCLC) using grid‐following inverter. The main contribution is the identification of the situations in which an ordinary grid‐following (GFL) photovoltaic (PV) Inverter can or cannot be used for voltage compensation at the PCC, avoiding the use of the PV system to provide reactive power in cases where voltage compensation will not be possible. If the voltage at the PCC cannot be compensated, the CS‐VDCPFC‐SCLC can inject or absorb the exact amount of reactive power demanded by the local load to adjust the power factor, hence, avoiding the use of capacitor banks, synchronous compensators, thyristor reactors and/or static compensators (STATCOM). In order to validate the proposed control technique with an advanced method for the design of power electronics components, a controller hardware‐in‐the‐loop (C‐HIL) setup is employed. Results are provided and demonstrate the effectiveness and feasibility of the proposed solution. A 3.0 kW laboratory prototype was also built and analysed.

IET Power ElectronicsVol. 18(1)
Universidade Federal do Triângulo Mineiro (BR), Universidade Federal de Uberlândia (BR)
Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior, Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico, Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de Minas Gerais
Openalex Percentile: Top 16%
Microgrid Control and Optimization
1.21
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.