Navahine v. Hawai‘i Department of Transportation

Abstract On 20 June 2024, a circuit court in the U.S. state of Hawai‘i approved the world’s first judicially enforceable Settlement Agreement, requiring state government to achieve zero emissions in transportation no later than 2045 to uphold the constitutional rights of children in the face of a climate emergency. This article describes the case of Navahine F. v. Hawai‘i Department of Transportation , including stories from some of the 13 brave youth plaintiffs who brought the case, the expert testimony that provided the technical and scientific basis for their constitutional claims, the factors leading to settlement and the terms of the Settlement Agreement. The article illustrates why the Navahine Settlement Agreement is unprecedented in scope and impact, and should be considered the strongest remedy ever achieved in the context of climate change litigation. At a time when stories of climate devastation and political gridlock dominate the headlines, the Navahine Settlement Agreement serves as an illustration of how climate justice can be achieved when all three branches of government decide to work with and in service of their youngest citizens.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
The International Journal of Children s Rights
Published
2025-09-24
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1163/15718182-33030008
Primary Topic
Environmental law and policy
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Navahine v. Hawai‘i Department of Transportation

Andrea Rodgers, Maria Beaucage
The International Journal of Children s Rights
Environmental law and policy
article

Navahine v. Hawai‘i Department of Transportation

Andrea Rodgers, Maria Beaucage
article en

Abstract

Abstract On 20 June 2024, a circuit court in the U.S. state of Hawai‘i approved the world’s first judicially enforceable Settlement Agreement, requiring state government to achieve zero emissions in transportation no later than 2045 to uphold the constitutional rights of children in the face of a climate emergency. This article describes the case of Navahine F. v. Hawai‘i Department of Transportation , including stories from some of the 13 brave youth plaintiffs who brought the case, the expert testimony that provided the technical and scientific basis for their constitutional claims, the factors leading to settlement and the terms of the Settlement Agreement. The article illustrates why the Navahine Settlement Agreement is unprecedented in scope and impact, and should be considered the strongest remedy ever achieved in the context of climate change litigation. At a time when stories of climate devastation and political gridlock dominate the headlines, the Navahine Settlement Agreement serves as an illustration of how climate justice can be achieved when all three branches of government decide to work with and in service of their youngest citizens.

The International Journal of Children s RightsVol. 33(3)
Children's Trust (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 59%
Environmental law and policy
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.