Effect of Mobilization and Screw Thrust Mobilization in T4 Syndrome

Introduction: The thoracic spine, consisting of twelve vertebrae (T1–T12), plays a crucial role in spinal stability and autonomic nervous system function. T4 syndrome, a dysfunction localized at the T4 vertebral level, presents with a combination of musculoskeletal and autonomic symptoms, including upper limb paresthesia, thoracic stiffness, and sympathetic nervous system disturbances. Although the exact pathophysiology is unclear, mechanical irritation of the sympathetic chain by hypomobile thoracic joints is hypothesized to contribute to symptom development.  Methods: 50 participants aged 18 to 50 years with a clinical diagnosis of T4 syndrome were selected for the study. The participants were randomly divided into two groups of 25 each. Group A received mobilization therapy daily for one week, while Group B received screw thrust mobilization therapy on alternate days over the course of one week.  Results: Both interventions resulted in statistically significant improvements across all measured outcomes. In Group A (mobilization), VAS scores decreased by 4.40 points (p < 0.0001), flexion and extension ROM increased by 0.464 and 0.368 units, respectively (p < 0.0001), and PSFS scores improved by 2.86 points (p < 0.0001). In Group B (screw thrust), VAS scores decreased by 3.76 points (p < 0.0001), with flexion and extension gains of 0.468 and 0.228 units, respectively, and PSFS scores increased by 2.40 points (p < 0.0001). Although mobilisation showed slightly greater improvements in pain reduction, flexion ROM, and functional ability, the differences were not statistically significant, except for thoracic extension ROM, where mobilisation significantly outperformed screw thrust (p = 0.0087).  Conclusion: Both mobilisation and screw thrust mobilization techniques are effective in reducing pain, improving thoracic mobility, and enhancing functional activity in patients with T4 Syndrome. Mobilization demonstrated slightly greater clinical benefits, particularly in thoracic extension. These findings support the use of manual therapy as a primary intervention for managing T4 Syndrome and emphasize the need for further research to explore long-term outcomes and autonomic nervous system modulation.

Authors

Publication Details

Published
2025-09-29
DOI
https://doi.org/10.38124/ijisrt/25sep1202
Primary Topic
Connective tissue disorders research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Effect of Mobilization and Screw Thrust Mobilization in T4 Syndrome

Shaikh Nabila Jaan Mohammed, Vaishali Kale
Connective tissue disorders research
article

Effect of Mobilization and Screw Thrust Mobilization in T4 Syndrome

Shaikh Nabila Jaan Mohammed, Vaishali Kale
article en

Abstract

Introduction: The thoracic spine, consisting of twelve vertebrae (T1–T12), plays a crucial role in spinal stability and autonomic nervous system function. T4 syndrome, a dysfunction localized at the T4 vertebral level, presents with a combination of musculoskeletal and autonomic symptoms, including upper limb paresthesia, thoracic stiffness, and sympathetic nervous system disturbances. Although the exact pathophysiology is unclear, mechanical irritation of the sympathetic chain by hypomobile thoracic joints is hypothesized to contribute to symptom development.  Methods: 50 participants aged 18 to 50 years with a clinical diagnosis of T4 syndrome were selected for the study. The participants were randomly divided into two groups of 25 each. Group A received mobilization therapy daily for one week, while Group B received screw thrust mobilization therapy on alternate days over the course of one week.  Results: Both interventions resulted in statistically significant improvements across all measured outcomes. In Group A (mobilization), VAS scores decreased by 4.40 points (p < 0.0001), flexion and extension ROM increased by 0.464 and 0.368 units, respectively (p < 0.0001), and PSFS scores improved by 2.86 points (p < 0.0001). In Group B (screw thrust), VAS scores decreased by 3.76 points (p < 0.0001), with flexion and extension gains of 0.468 and 0.228 units, respectively, and PSFS scores increased by 2.40 points (p < 0.0001). Although mobilisation showed slightly greater improvements in pain reduction, flexion ROM, and functional ability, the differences were not statistically significant, except for thoracic extension ROM, where mobilisation significantly outperformed screw thrust (p = 0.0087).  Conclusion: Both mobilisation and screw thrust mobilization techniques are effective in reducing pain, improving thoracic mobility, and enhancing functional activity in patients with T4 Syndrome. Mobilization demonstrated slightly greater clinical benefits, particularly in thoracic extension. These findings support the use of manual therapy as a primary intervention for managing T4 Syndrome and emphasize the need for further research to explore long-term outcomes and autonomic nervous system modulation.

Openalex Percentile: Top 71%
Connective tissue disorders research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.