Prevalence of refractive errors and non-strabismic binocular vision anomalies in symptomatic and asymptomatic university students in Saudi Arabia

Abstract: PURPOSE: This study was conducted to estimate the prevalence of refractive errors and nonstrabismic binocular vision anomalies in young adult university students with and without symptoms in Saudi Arabia. METHODS: This study was conducted at the Department of Optometry at King Saud University, including 304 participants aged 16–35 years. The participants were categorized into symptomatic and asymptomatic groups based on the total score of the Convergence Insufficiency (CI) Symptom Survey. Full and comprehensive optometric assessments–including subjective refraction, accommodation, and vergence–were performed, and a diagnosis was established by comparing various parameters specific to each patient. RESULTS: Among the 304 patients, 165 were female and 134 were male. The prevalence of all types of refractive errors was 46%, with myopic errors being the most common type. The prevalences of all types of accommodation and vergence anomalies were 33.50% and 50%, respectively. The most commonly observed accommodative anomaly was accommodative infacility, followed by accommodative insufficiency. The most commonly observed vergence anomaly was CI, followed by vergence infacility. Most participants reported symptoms; however, the differences in prevalence rates between symptomatic and asymptomatic participants were not statistically significant. CONCLUSION: Although refractive errors were fully corrected and visual acuity was within normal limits, full and comprehensive optometric assessments were crucial to detect different types of visual system anomalies. Early identification and management offer the best chance for academic success among symptomatic university individuals.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Saudi Journal of Ophthalmology
Published
2025-09-29
DOI
https://doi.org/10.4103/sjopt.sjopt_109_25
Primary Topic
Ophthalmology and Visual Impairment Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Prevalence of refractive errors and non-strabismic binocular vision anomalies in symptomatic and asymptomatic university students in Saudi Arabia

Mosaad Alhassan, Essam Almutleb, Ali Almustanyir, Balsam Alabdulkader et al.
Saudi Journal of Ophthalmology
Ophthalmology and Visual Impairment Studies
article

Prevalence of refractive errors and non-strabismic binocular vision anomalies in symptomatic and asymptomatic university students in Saudi Arabia

Mosaad Alhassan, Essam Almutleb, Ali Almustanyir, Balsam Alabdulkader, Tahani M. Alqahtani, Khalaf Alruways, Haroon Alhijji, Afnan Baashen, Ahmed Alageel, Hatoon Badukhen
article en

Abstract

Abstract: PURPOSE: This study was conducted to estimate the prevalence of refractive errors and nonstrabismic binocular vision anomalies in young adult university students with and without symptoms in Saudi Arabia. METHODS: This study was conducted at the Department of Optometry at King Saud University, including 304 participants aged 16–35 years. The participants were categorized into symptomatic and asymptomatic groups based on the total score of the Convergence Insufficiency (CI) Symptom Survey. Full and comprehensive optometric assessments–including subjective refraction, accommodation, and vergence–were performed, and a diagnosis was established by comparing various parameters specific to each patient. RESULTS: Among the 304 patients, 165 were female and 134 were male. The prevalence of all types of refractive errors was 46%, with myopic errors being the most common type. The prevalences of all types of accommodation and vergence anomalies were 33.50% and 50%, respectively. The most commonly observed accommodative anomaly was accommodative infacility, followed by accommodative insufficiency. The most commonly observed vergence anomaly was CI, followed by vergence infacility. Most participants reported symptoms; however, the differences in prevalence rates between symptomatic and asymptomatic participants were not statistically significant. CONCLUSION: Although refractive errors were fully corrected and visual acuity was within normal limits, full and comprehensive optometric assessments were crucial to detect different types of visual system anomalies. Early identification and management offer the best chance for academic success among symptomatic university individuals.

Saudi Journal of Ophthalmology
King Saud University (SA), University of Hafr Al-Batin (SA)
Openalex Percentile: Top 63%
Ophthalmology and Visual Impairment Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.